The White Rose Resistance (WRR), where Zacharia sat on the board until February, is best known for its anti-abortion disinformation, harassment campaigns against providers, and for collecting the country’s worst extremists. The group’s national outreach director AJ Hurley, for example, was charged with felony stalking of an abortion provider in San Francisco in 2022. Per his own bio, Hurley is also connected to the woman who was found with multiple fetuses in her home
‘Pro life’ has always just been pro killing women.
So yeah, y’all hear that? If you get pregnant and something goes wrong and the fetus does at any stage, you die too.
Go fuck yourself bitch. Your whole administration needs to be in jail.
I started to consider how its possible to end up with someone this bad as press secretary.
Is it:
- No one with competence wants to work for this administration
- Someone close to her bought Trump’s crypto
- they purposely put someone who is incompetent there as a “fuck you” to the press
All of the above?
100 bucks says she’s had an abortion or two.
How about death penalty to Putin-supporting traitors to the West?
So pro-life they’ll kill you for disagreeing.
The death penalty isn’t even commonly applied to one-off first degree murder convictions. It normally takes some other factor such as torture or multiple killings to escalate it to death penalty.
Even if you think abortion is murder this is detached from reality.
It’s their own fan fiction. You WONT BELIEVE the crazy plot twist on page 2027
They’re MAGAts; they’re unconcerned about reality, unless it’s gas prices, but they’re oddly quiet right now. I figured they’d be up in pitchforks.
Ehhh, I kinda have to push back on this a bit here. I’m 100% on board that this lady is a wacko and monster, and that women should be able to abort as many babies as they damn well please, to be clear. It’s just that from these peoples perspective it’s a baby right? I’m pretty sure someone murdering a newborn would be treated more harshly than a typical murderer. So if we are looking at it from the weirdos perspective we have to look at it as a baby murder. Not just a normal murder. Now I might be wrong about the specifics of baby murder. I’m no lawyer. But I thought it relevant to bring up.
There was recently a mother that killed her 3 kids, admitted to it, and was likely going to a mental institute where she would have been able to be released within months. It’s not that uncommon to hear about a college girl that kills her baby shortly after birth as a way to try to escape the reality.
I’m not that informed on the subject but I would be very surprised if death penalty was ever given for a single instance of killing a baby. Death penalty isn’t even legal in many states although that’s a separate controversial issue.
Took one fucking search on duckduckgo: https://deathpenaltyinfo.org/stories/use-of-the-death-penalty-for-killing-a-child-victim
It would have taken you less time than typing that comment.
Pretty much all of these examples included additional crimes such as rape, multiple murders, etc. which was my point
The two that don’t were later overturned.
Did you read the article? Maybe spend more time doing research than writing a comment… Or better yet at least read the comment you are responding to first.
I will soften my position from “ever” because that includes some of the archaic shit the US did in prior centuries. A better articulation is that they have done any recently
Did YOU read the article? These are the laws in these states that specifically state what the aggravating circumstance is.
Table 1. States Authorizing the Death Penalty for Killing a Child State Child-Victim Aggravating Circumstance
Arizona
The defendant was an adult at the time the offense was committed or was tried as an adult and the murdered person was under fifteen years of age or was seventy years of age or older
Arkansas
The capital murder was committed against a person whom the defendant knew or reasonably should have known was especially vulnerable to the attack because the person was 12 years of age or younger
Connecticut (prior to abolition)
Murder of a person under 16 years of age
Delaware (prior to abolition)
The victim was a child 14 years of age or younger, and the murder was committed by an individual who is at least 4 years older than the victim
Florida
The victim of the capital felony was a person less than 12 years of age
Illinois (prior to abolition)
The murdered individual was under 12 years of age and the death resulted from exceptionally brutal or heinous behavior indicative of wanton cruelty
Indiana
The victim of the murder was less than 12 years of age
Louisiana
The victim was under the age of 12 years
Nevada
The murder as committed upon a person less than 14 years of age
New Jersey (prior to abolition)
The victim was less than 14 years old
Ohio
The offender in the commission of the offense, purposefully caused the death of another who was under thirteen years of age at the time of the commission of the offense and the defendant committed the offense with prior calculation and design
Oregon
The victim of the intentional homicide was under the age of 14 years old
Pennsylvania
The victim was a child under 12 years of age
South Carolina
The murder of a child 11 years or younger
South Dakota
The offense was outrageously or wantonly vile, horrible, or inhuman in that it involved torture, depravity of mind, or an aggravated battery to the victim. Any murder is wantonly vile, horrible, and inhuman if the victim is less than thirteen years of age
Tennessee
The murder was committed against a person less than 12 years of age and then defendant was 18 years of age or older
Texas
The person murders an individual under 10 years of age
Virginia (prior to abolition)
Murder victim was under the age of 14 and the defendant was 21 years of age of older
Wyoming
The defendant knew or reasonably should have known the victim was less than 17 years of age
Do you not understand that the maximum allowed penalty does not signal it is the standard or common penalty? Did you read the article?
Please stop responding with your bullshit 🫰
“Thou shalt not kill.” not “Thou shalt not kill babies”
They are perverting their own Christian commandments in their bloodlust.
Lol knowing this admin the witch has had at least two in her past.
My god, the world has come crazy. Abandon this world!
Can’t wait til her abortion records drop after some breach in the near future.
She’ll turn it into a whole new grift. She was led into it through liberal ideology, they practically strapped her to the table against her will, now she is reformed and more christian than ever, she’s here to stop other women from making the same mistake…blah blah blah so on and so forth
If the standard republican hypocrisy is anything to go by it must be extensive.
Where do they keep pulling these hellish ghouls from?
The Newsmax desk, apparently
My god that thumbnail is scary.
Literal actual extremists fill the government and yet when someone says “maybe our tax money should go to pay for healthcare and education” they’re branded an extremist by practically everyone (Republicans, media, centrist Dems) and they rarely make it into government… Actual violent extremists who want to take rights away and literally put people to death get elected and/or placed into government, but people who actually want to help us are deemed “too far left/extreme.”
…
right… and for that to be the case, it has to have broad support amongst the populus. I mean someone votes for the likes of people like Mitch, Trump, Cruz, Hakeem, Schumer etal not primaried decades ago ffs
American Mass Media is completely and utterly sold and corrupt.
These fuckers sanewash all of Trump’s diarrhea, but anytime there is even a wiff of policies for the people, they’ll scrutinize it to death.
Few million to feed the poor?? OMG 2 WEEK INVESTIGATIVE SEGMENTS, HOW CAN WE PAY FOR THIS??? I
Military loses BILLIONS… nothing to see here. Move along.
I’m sure Ivanka, err, Katie would change her tune if she found herself with a life-threatening ectopic pregnancy. “Rules for thee but not for me”.
She’d probably change her tune if she got pregnant at all.
Even if it’s a Trumpling?
Their delusional answer to that is ‘that’s not an abortion’. Despite there being no medical difference in the procedures done, and in fact the record in your medical history is going to say ‘abortion’, because that’s what it fucking is. But abortions are done by evil people who murder babies, so their righteous medical procedure wasn’t an abortion.
No because none of this applies to them.
She probably already had more than zero abortions. But that is of course different as she is rich, white and firmly committed to make every women’s life even more dangerous.
Yep. I’m actually surprised that US prohibition ever ended because apparently it was pretty easy for white peolle to get a prescription “for medicinal purposes,” meaning prohibition was just for poors and blacks. I guess alcohol is big business and the corporations got tired of watching the mob take it all. It’s the only explanation that makes any sense.
So their response to somebody committing (in their mind) a sin (because that’s the only reason they would be pissed off in the first place) according to their hoohaw religion is to… commit more sin?
Fucking hell on earth man. Fucking hell
They do not respond to this logic. The hypocrisy is the point and they consider this hypocrisy good. If you kill, you’re a murderer, have rejected the Lord, and deserve death. Do not waste your breath trying to explain the ethics of the death penalty to someone who supports it because of sheer bloodlust.
If you ask, “What if an innocent person is inadvertently found guilty, executed, and then later exonerated?”, that will not register to them as a valid concern. They think it’s worth it and you are wasting your breath by asking. They believe in a God who ordained a commandment against killing, while also commanding genocide. They think the Creator of the Universe and therefore reality is just like that. It can’t be wrong. By definition.
I wonder if they would respond to the logic that they are playing god. They think it’s fine to do God’s job for him, for them to judge and mete out his punishment in this life, far before the real “judgement day.” That’s awfully presumptuous, considering that’s God’s job and the Bible even says “leave it to me, do not attempt.”
“Death to all those who oppose my worldview, because they are a threat and must certainly view US as a threat to THEIR worldview” - the problem with multiple fundamentally different worldviews existing
This is a topic in philosophy. You define what’s moral and immoral, and then you realize that sometimes your moral code must be broken for exceptions. Here’s an example:
Killing is immoral.
Gay is immoral.
Killing gay is therefore good. Why? Because my religion says gay is immoral and I want to get the good ending (afterlife).
Which is why religious people are all fucking scary to us queers, because we know that fundamentally they’re playing by different rules. Even the "good ones"are still playing by the same rulebook, and since they all pick and choose what rules they follow and when… There really isn’t a social contract that we can trust anymore.
Which puts us atheists in a weird place where we have to just have faith that we won’t be fucked over or murdered by some messed up person. And that faith is now non-existent because it has no basis in reason anymore because of this exact shit. There’s more pattern recognition in having faith that BAD stuff happens because of religious people. Therefore, religious people are bad people. Yes I know there’s nuance, but that collective cognitive system is stressed trying to exist in this shitty society where about half of all voting adults want any and all bad endings for me and anybody that helps me in any way or anybody like me or anybody that remotely agrees with me.
