on Thursday, Jeffries refused to saywhether he supported or opposed controversial efforts to integrate the US and Israeli militaries.
Jeffries also said this summer that he opposes Medicare for All, reversing his earlier position, and putting him at odds with a number of progressive Democrats who campaigned on the platform.
He’s been consistently hostile to the progressive faction of his party, refusing to endorse Mamdani for New York City mayor for months. And it was recently revealed that Jeffries met with Jared Kushner in private before the midterms
…Many progressives view Jeffries as an establishment figure who offers no hope for meaningful change and want someone less beholden to corporate interests to be speaker. Jeffries and some of his allies, meanwhile, have suggested that denying him the opportunity to become the first Black speaker in US history would be, to quote Bloomberg, “racially insensitive”.
…And we’ve seen this craven use of identity politics to smear progressive politics before, haven’t we? It’s the Bernie bros playbook all over again.
Tell ya what, Hakeem:
You let somebody else who’s not a corrupt shill be Speaker of the House for the next two years, and you spend those two years BUSTING YOUR ASS for progressive legislation to help fix this mess that you helped cause.
ONLY THEN will we even BOTHER listening to you ASK about being considered for this role.
You have NO business being involved in government. You do nothing worthwhile. You don’t serve a purpose. You BLOCK the people who are trying. You are a HUGE part of the problem.
Hakeem Jeffries is a republican, effectively. It’s controlled opposition.
Jeffries and Schumer are just more Sinemas/Fettermans being exposed.
I’m actually very pleased with just how quickly progressives came out swinging against this bullshit. They’re too big to ignore now.
They are a uniparty, controlled opposition.
Republicans have RINOs, well Democrats have DINOs.
deleted by creator
Democrats win in historical landslide we finally have opportunity to have government to listen to us and we are falling for effort to divide us and result with weak Democrats that are fighting against each other and Democrats didn’t even start working.
You want Congress to act certain way instead of micromanaging who is the leader contact your senators and representative and say what your stance is.
The speaker and majority leader in Senate’s job is to make sure that all Democrats vote together. If Democrats are all aligned then the job of leadership is easier.
Here is HCR explanation of it that says it much better: https://youtu.be/Eqjm4avbvdw?t=2011
Never thought I’d downvote a pro-HCR comment, but here we are. She’s just wrong on this.
The primary legislative job of both the Senate Majority Leader and Speaker of the House is to control what, when, and how any particular bit of legislation comes to the floor for a vote. They are first and foremost both legislative positions, and it is in the legislative duties that their vast individual power resides.
You can have an entire party that wants something, even a supermajority, and not have your bill come to the floor because your own party’s Speaker blocked it. Case in point: all the times the House Republicans in the current Congress have had to sign a discharge petition to get around Mike Johnson.
- In March 2025, a petition to make a House rule to allow proxy voting by members who gave birth, or with spouses who did so, reached the requisite number of signatures. The petition was tabled in April 2025 after the House leadership approved rules to establish vote pairing.
- A second petition reached the required majority in November 2025 to bring forward the Epstein Files Transparency Act. The bill passed the House on November 18, 2025 by a vote of 427 to 1, formally passed the Senate by unanimous consent on November 19, 2025, and was signed by President Trump later that day.
- A third petition reached the required majority in November 2025 to bring forward a bill restoring collective bargaining rights for most federal employees. The bill passed the House on December 11, 2025 by a vote of 231 to 195.
- A fourth petition reached the required majority in December 2025 to bring forward a bill authorizing a three-year extension of the enhanced tax credits under the Affordable Care Act. It passed the House on January 8, 2026 by a vote of 230 to 196.
- A fifth petition reached the required majority in March 2026 to bring forward a bill directing the Department of Homeland Security to designate Haiti for Temporary Protected Status. The bill passed the House on April 16, 2026 by a vote of 224-204.
- A sixth petition reached the required majority in May 2026 to bring forward a bill to providence financial assistance to Ukraine, add new economic sanctions on Russia, and help to fund Ukrainian reconstruction. The bill passed the House on June 4, 2026 by a vote of 226 to 195.
- A seventh petition reached the required majority in May 2026 to bring forward a bill to amend the National Labor Relations Act to impose strict federal timelines and mandatory binding arbitration on first union contract negotiations. The bill passed the House on June 9, 2026 by a vote of 230 to 193.
- An eighth petition reached the required majority in September 2026 to bring forward a bill that allows a veteran with a combat-related disability to receive retirement pay, without reduction, concurrently with their disability compensation. The bill passed the House on November 12, 2026 by a vote of 392 to 18.
- A ninth petition reached the required majority in November 2026 to bring forward the Epstein Files Transparency Act II.
That’s what Dems in the new Congress will have to do to get around Jeffries. Same goes for Chuck Schumer, especially when it comes to slowing down cash flowing to Israel:
I have a lot of respect for HCR and listen to her regularly, but on this she is dead wrong.
Neither Schumer nor Jeffries will advance legislation they don’t like, and have proven it time and again, most recently with Jeffries not whipping the Hegseth impeachment vote.
I listen to HCR almost daily, but she respectfully misses the mark on this topic. Sorry.
“Elections for Senate Majority Leader and Speaker don’t happen until January,” but the fight begins now. It’s an absurd comment to make and is like saying, “Elections for midterms aren’t until November, so why start campaigning 3 months out!?”
If those positions are representative of ideological-center and carrying the broader Congressional Chamber, then leaving these conservative-right Leadership roles in place is a flagrant dismissal of The People’s desire to shift the Overton Window back left at least a little bit. Both House and Senate just shifted back left, and leadership should proportionally shift leftward in kind.
Literally: Without the Speaker’s approval, bills cannot be brought to the floor without a vote – **IF Jeffries is a Sinema-like plant, then what does that spell for the Agenda, especially when he has already backpedaled on interest in Medicare For All?
These are DEMOCRATIC Leaders and in ostensibly SAFE BLUE SEATS. They should be significantly more left than this, and while they’re procedural positions they absolutely do hold powerful voices in terms of determining the vision and agend afor Democrats.
If Jeffries wants to be the House Whip, that’s another story. Let him. If Schumer wants to be in an advisory role as a US Senator and cede ground, then let him.
But they must go in terms of leadership positions.
“Nothing gets done if you lose the caucus.” — Newsflash: Nothing is going to get done anyway, because you (HCR, etc.) still pretend that Republicans are acting in good albeit ideologically-opposed faith. They are not. They will play scorched earth forever. Trump will veto anything and everything and blame Democrats. Have we STILL not learned this lesson, dating all the way back to Obama? For fuck sake.
Look,
- The first biggest impediment to progress was Republican Congress — Done.
- The next biggest impediment where we have agency to change: DINO Democrats in Congress — In Progress.
- The next biggest impediment to progress is Trump’s Veto Power.
If Congressional Democrats push Medicare For All up against Trump (which has supermajority support by the electorate0 and force him to veto it, then that sets Democrats up so well for 2028.
- Move Democratic Leadership Left a bit.
- Distance from AIPAC and Private Equity lobbyists.
- Set the chess pieces for 2028.
It’s a no-brainer. 2028 Democratic Primaries began the moment Midterm polls closed, and I’m all for this purification process and holding our own accountable as to the direction this country MUST go.
I have ZERO interest in compromising with fascist Republicans. Zero. Neither should you. Press the attack. Don’t start coddling conservatives… Again.
I don’t like Schummer he was already a majority leader and he showed that he is a bad leader.
I don’t know how good is Jefferies, but I don’t like him either especially after he thought meeting with Kushner was a good idea. Definitively not good optics meeting with a civilian who has no position in government and is close to the center of the corruption Democrats supposed to investigate.
Having said that we should express our concerns but not force then to choose specific people. The leader is there to make sure all Democrats act as a single block.
You are forgetting that there are still many non progressive Democrats and the tough pay will be to have them vote together. It is not an easy job, and someone who would be good needs to be great at internal politics and be liked or respected by their colleagues.
This is why Pelosi is considered as one of the best speakers, because every bill she brought for a vote, passed. She definitively wasn’t progressive, but she helped push some progressive changes.
If we force them to choose someone who isn’t working well with test of them we will get a democratic version of Mike Johnson. Unable to pass nearly anything despite Republicans holding both houses and best at shutting down the Congress.
On Senate we had Van Hollen expressing interest in the position and we had other senators voicing support for him. This is good.
Though in House there is no one who did that. I mean people try to bring Pressley but she didn’t do it officially. I guess she started a petition, but that is going the wrong way, she should talk privately with her colleagues whether they would support her abd then express candidacy. Starting with a petition to people implies that maybe she doesn’t get along well, and if that’s true that might be a disaster.
The efforts to divide are coming from the inside now. There’s a realignment that may be happening and it will squeeze out the old guard. Yes they need to work together - but under what banner? There’s not much point to having democrats in power if they keep doing the same thing as the republicans. You can tell the conservative Democrats to not divide and support the progressives, just as you can want it to go the other way. There are some fairly distinct policy directions to choose here, not much middle ground.
He’s a fake ass Obama wanna be. Jefferies lives in a fantasy world where Obama’s politics would still be relevant. We are not in that America anymore. People want strong action, not milquetoast centrist compromise. We saw Donald Trump and the Republican steam roll everything through for the last two years, so we know it’s possible. We all know that centrist compromise shit always favors the rich over us. We’re sick of corporate stooges doing Progressive cosplay.
Ayanna Pressley would be a great choice to get a progressive that is also a black American. She would be the first black female majority leader and isn’t that a bigger win than just a black man.
She would be the first black female majority leader and isn’t that a bigger win than just a black man.
Yup! Especially if said black man is the in many ways even worse than herself hand picked protégé of Nancy Pelosi.
Add that said black female Speaker would be a legitimately badass progressive like Pressley, and it’s obvious to anyone not too corrupt or brainwashed to see reason!
Yeah, Ayanna Pressley sounds like a great idea. Why should we choose Jeffries if the only thing he has going for him is his identity? Offer substance or get out of the way for someone who will.
I’d like to see Pressley run for speaker. If my district rep was a Dem I would submit my opinion to their office. We need someone who will deliver.
Jeffries most recently failed at the basic duty of party leader to whip votes to impeach Hegseth.
Clearly unfit to carry that role as speaker.So he and his allies actually want him to be a DEI hire? Giving him the role just to check off having a black Speaker is exactly what Republicans accuse the left of doing, and it would be so obvious because of how little he’d accomplish and how much the progressive block would hate him.
Let’s focus on what we want and let them fight it out on how we get there. We came up with a list, add as you will.
- Stop funding the war
- Roll back Trump’s tariffs on Canada (and more)
- Stop taxing low and moderate incomes
- Restore Medicaid, SNAP, and Obamacare subsidies
- Restore the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
- Pass Medicare for All
- Cap tax breaks for private retirement savings
- Repeal Right-to-Work laws and go after union busters
- Ban algorithmic pricing
- Remove contribution caps for social security
- Start taxing billionaires like they did in NYC. Only 2% left the city. Worth it.
- Raise the federal minimum wage
- Get rid of Citizen’s United
- Regulate AI to keep jobs and have communities be able to control them
Hear hear
This was expected, instead of letting conservatives control the narrative we need to keep pushing things left.
Keep calling congress members and voting!
If he’s so eager to be the first black speaker, he’d better embrace the attributes expected from a majority oeader and speaker. His positions suggest he’s not that interested in representing the current flock of Democratic senators, but only in exercising power to enforce his own personal preferences.
Corporate Democrat… what a disgusting oxymoron.
Thank you for bringing this matter to my attention.
Many progressives
view Jeffries as an establishment figure who offers no hope for meaningful changeare paying attentionSimplified it for them
and
want someone less beholden to corporate interests to be speaker.aren’t suckersSimplified it for them again
Jeffries and some of his allies, meanwhile, have
suggested that denying him the opportunity to become the first Black speaker in US history would be, to quote Bloomberg, “racially insensitive”.lied and done a DARVOFixed it for them.
And we’ve seen this craven use of identity politics to smear progressive politics before, haven’t we? It’s the Bernie bros playbook all over again.
They may trick the dolts in the party, but my eyes have been pried open. I’ll never vote for these bloodsuckers again.
Not news to me.
deleted by creator
