Trump has claimed Reflecting Pool ‘vandals’ could face ‘years in jail.’ By contrast, he’s urged the public to move on from the Epstein files
        • Crazyslinkz@lemmy.world
          51·
          2 days ago

          You got him with a 2 year olds defensive argument.

          No I’m not

          Where’s the “I’m rubber your glue…”

          Or “nuh uh”

          /s

            • BillyClark@piefed.socialEnglish
              31·
              1 day ago

              You are the one who made the original incorrect assertion without evidence. That which is asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof.

              • null@piefed.nullspace.lolEnglish
                11·
                1 day ago

                So I can dismiss this comment because you didn’t provide proof? Or do we agree that reasoning is dumb?

                • BillyClark@piefed.socialEnglish
                  31·
                  1 day ago

                  My statement was not an assertion of provable fact like yours was, but a method for ensuring that people can participate in debates against people who use bad faith tactics like you use.

                  I am blocking you after I submit this comment.

                  • Pinto, the Bean@lemmy.world
                    1·
                    40 minutes ago

                    since you want to be a little debate-pervert, let’s do it.

                    Coming from null is hilarious, is he genuinely this stupid and dense or just pretending to be a moron?

                  • null@piefed.nullspace.lolEnglish
                    11·
                    1 day ago

                    Lol alright, since you want to be a little debate-pervert, let’s do it.

                    Here’s your positive claim (assertion of provable fact):

                    Being a part of an active case is completely separate from being classified.

                    Here is your evidence for it: