Trump has claimed Reflecting Pool ‘vandals’ could face ‘years in jail.’ By contrast, he’s urged the public to move on from the Epstein files
    • BillyClark@piefed.socialEnglish
      31·
      2 days ago

      You are the one who made the original incorrect assertion without evidence. That which is asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof.

      • null@piefed.nullspace.lolEnglish
        11·
        2 days ago

        So I can dismiss this comment because you didn’t provide proof? Or do we agree that reasoning is dumb?

        • BillyClark@piefed.socialEnglish
          31·
          2 days ago

          My statement was not an assertion of provable fact like yours was, but a method for ensuring that people can participate in debates against people who use bad faith tactics like you use.

          I am blocking you after I submit this comment.

          • Pinto, the Bean@lemmy.world
            1·
            12 hours ago

            since you want to be a little debate-pervert, let’s do it.

            Coming from null is hilarious, is he genuinely this stupid and dense or just pretending to be a moron?

          • null@piefed.nullspace.lolEnglish
            11·
            2 days ago

            Lol alright, since you want to be a little debate-pervert, let’s do it.

            Here’s your positive claim (assertion of provable fact):

            Being a part of an active case is completely separate from being classified.

            Here is your evidence for it: