Give it a minute. The American general public had at least ten years to get familiar with Trump and what he’s about. His plans for this year were not hidden, even a little bit. They voted him in again anyway just a year ago. Now they’re acting like this was all an unexpected shock.
All we learned from this week is that Americans are capable of remembering not to put their hand on the hot stove a third time, provided their other hand is still on the same hot stove from the second time.
Our media went to great lengths to hide the bad shit about this pedo and to amplify any and every flaw about Biden/Harris. Even the “left wing media” that the right likes to cry about also did this. And many won’t care until it directly affects themselves, and even then only one that specific topic.
The American general public had at least ten years to get familiar with Trump and what he’s about.
Far longer than that.
He’s been known publicly as a sack of shit since at least the '90s.
But then puffed up as a genius business man by The Apprentice. Remember that most people the world over are absolutely rock-stupid and will believe whatever’s on TV. “He ripped off everyone he ever did business with and bankrupted every company he ever started” “Whatever, I like the way he says ‘You’re fired!’ He must be great at businessing!”
It’s not that the public forgot, but that leadership failed to offer an alternative other than “not Trump”. When the Democrats do offer an alternative like Mamdani, people show up. And 80% of those that showed up voted for him, not against the other candidate. Not even Obama accomplished that.
It’s wasn’t “not Trump”. It was NOT FASCISM. That people STILL don’t understand this, while further entrenching themselves within faulty logic bodes poorly for the future.
America will be remembered as a cautionary tale on not leaning from history…
What will the Democratic leadership learn from Mamdani’s win?
They’ve only taken away “charismatic” candidate
A win doesn’t mean shit unless it’s backed up by the promises made, and progress is the result. All winning doesn’t is start the clock.
He’s going to need to prove himself. And if he does. And the democrats don’t notice- we will deal with that then. Right now is not time time to suffer illusions.
As long as we’re paying attention to those who can imagine a different future, then we’re at the same table.
The difference is being able to tell from one’s imagination, and one’s capability. It’s the same as how people have come to assume ‘potential’ and ‘actual’ mean the same thing. They’re not, and believing that they are is how we ended up here. Because at a the end of this path, lies the mindset that good is the enemy of perfect.
My point is that we haven’t had good candidates as evidence by their losing. When we actually do have a good candidate that wins we are suddenly the idealists that aren’t practical, as if winning power (in spite of both political establishments) is something other than an act of pragmatism.
Eventually the rest of the world will build a wall around US.
Don’t be mistaken, Mandani’s win is not America’s win, it’s NY win. America as a whole is way more stupid and way more evil than that. Hell, even broad democratic voters are worse than that, Bernie lost popular vote on primaries twice afterall.
It was not just “not Trump”, it was “not insane”, and not threatening to tear down democracy and destroy healthcare and the economy. It was business as usual over sociopathy.
The choice should have been clear. But too many Americans are sociopaths, and chose to really stick it to the minorities until they die. Americans voted for Trump not despite he is a sociopath, but because of it. Americans want revenge for their lousy lives more than they want to improve things for everybody.
The Dems won other places than New York.It was “not Trump, status quo.” Nobody but the rich liked the status quo, but anybody who’s not an idiot knew it was MUCH, MUCH BETTER than…well, what we have now.
When the Democrats do offer an alternative like Mamdani, people show up.
I’d like to rephrase that to make a point: When progressive voters show up and vote in the primaries for the more progressive candidate, there’s more likely to be a more progressive Democratic candidate on the ballot in the general and people will show up for them.
Point is the Democratic Party powers that be did not willingly “offer an alternative like Mamdani”. They hated that he was the candidate and tried to get Cuomo elected instead. Mamdani was only “offered” thanks to the voters who showed up and voted for him in the primary.
He killed it. Lindsey Graham was right
The Mierdas Touch.
This one? https://youtu.be/mkXIWPmdfdo
Edit: no wait, this one? https://youtu.be/6MTTug24lpE
Edit2: Ohhh, no, it’s gotta be this one right? https://x.com/LindseyGrahamSC/status/727604522156228608
Thank you for the citations.
USA according to tRump: Dead country, dead parties… jeeze, what’s next a dead president?!
what’s next a dead president?!
I’d be OK with Trump killing that guy.
He’s too narcissistic to even realize the irony that it is his policies, his incompetent appointees, and his apoplectic abuse that is crashing the GOP. It is insane that the meltdown has been this glacially paced.
He’ll be back; we’re in the devaluation phase of the narcissistic abuse cycle. Next, he’ll try to discard the whole party to start his own. When his finds that unworkable, he’ll come slithering back.
Let’s just hope this time most republicans will be too exhausted to continue propagandizing themselves with Trump’s inane double-think.
America, the abused house wife, is realizing how abusive their husband is … again.
I don’t understand how the working class folks “shifted” to Democratic party.
Haven’t the democrats been the working class party all along?
Citizens United made bribery legal, and the working class has been broken down for decades and forced into poverty.
There is no American “working class” party, because they can’t afford to bribe any of the parties. Democrats sorta kinda pretend to care, occasionally, so they are currently wearing the mantle.
Citizens United made it worse, but we were fucked before then. Lobbying is just legalized bribery. We need to repeal Citizens United but then we need to keep going and rework the whole campaign finance and lobbying systems too.
Even with W, there was a huge “smart sounding” = coastal elite narrative going with their: he looks like a guy you could have a beer with. Which apparently is more important than not kneecapping your union, demolishing the economy, or starting illegal wars
Theoretically. In, practice, not so much, but far more than the Republicans, and that’s the problem with the neo-liberal Democrat party.
Working class people tend to be less-educated, live in more rural areas, be a part of less-diverse communities, and be prone to accept authority figures. And the GOP has spent a half-century trying to convince that exact group that every problem they’re experiencing is actually the opposite. So they vote against their best interests in election after election, and then the people they voted for successfully convince them that the Democrats actually torpedoed it all and they could’ve actually made everything better if they just had one more term…rinse and repeat across 25+ election cycles.
Working class people tend to be less-educated, live in more rural areas
I think the working class is much broader than that, and part of our problem is this perception.
It’s definitely getting broader than that, with the way that wealth stratification continues to skyrocket. But I don’t mean “actually rural,” I really do mean “more rural.” A good amount of city real estate prices have priced lower-income folks out of the urban core in many (most?) cities, gentrifying the downtown and resulting in a reversal of 1980s White Flight as the working class move to now-cheaper suburban and rural communities.
I didn’t mean just farmers or whatever. I just mean people who haven’t got the money to live in the Trader Joe’s district.
People that make enough to “live in the trader Joe’s district” but have to keep working at their job to keep living in their apartment have way more in common with people that make less than them than they do the people that don’t have to work at all.
We know that, but decades of Republican propaganda has got the small business owners, who get absolutely wrecked by Republican policies, thinking they’re on the side of the rich against the employee class.
Not since at least the Clinton years. The US doesn’t have a mainstream working class party.
Hasn’t been one in the anglosphere in general for a long time. The NDP is the closest but they’ve given up their working class cred years ago. And labor, well, if Blair didn’t convince you they were a lost cause Starmer will. I’m not familiar enough with auspol but I’d imagine the trend holds.
He’s falling into our Cardiac Trap. 🤫
Hmmm, wonder who killed it
NOT true! As long as they CONTINUE Firing Millions of American Workers while Kidnapping Children, Raising GROCERY prices, ELIMINATING Air Travel, raising Healthcare Premiums and PROTECTING Rich Child Rapists America will WELCOME the Republicans with open arms in the Midterms! The TIMING is what was Wrong NOT the Policies!
It’s a well known fact that the party in power usually suffers losses during midterms. So it’s great that DEMs are winning. But it isn’t over by any stretch. Gotta keep fighting.
These weren’t midterms, they were an off-year election. The midterms will be next year.
They are usually low turnout, but saw a historic turnout in NY and NJ, not sure about the others offhand.
Off-years you do not typically see this kind of sweeping response, its absolutely atypical.
I’m not suggesting its time to stop, but clarifying that this is not the norm.
These weren’t midterms, they were an off-year election. The midterms will be next year.
Still applies
Kind of.
Its a barometer, and it usually features some degree of losses for the party in power. The degree of which is a big indicator for the midterms. While the presidents party tends to lose out overall in off-years, the degree to which can vary drastically.
Off year elections do not have sweeping losses or historically significant voter turnout though. They also dont generate anywhere near the kind of media attention this year saw, or the historic amounts of money being put into a mayoral election as we saw in NYC.
We shouldn’t downplay the significance of yesterdays election. And it was significant.
Yeah, it is a good win that should be celebrate. Just don’t want people getting complacent.
We shouldn’t be complacent or lose hope.
I’m… not exactly a fan of the existence of a state in general, but I’ll happily support more dem-socialists and the ousting of establishment democrats (aka “traditional” republicans with a blue sign).
Any amount of moving that Overton window to the left will be great in my opinion.
