• kestrel7_7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    17 days ago

    It’s more like it costs more money than that to allow someone to be homeless, since they’ll be more likely to use emergency services and such.

    $16K is actually not too far off from what I spend yearly on feeding and housing myself in Seattle. Remember that most housing costs in this country are dramatically inflated by rent (aka landlord greed).

    Remember that homeless/unemployed people are likely to qualify for Medicaid and other benefits

    • Pyr@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 days ago

      Yeah $16k annually sounds about right. But they say “permanently” which I read as $16k total not annually.