There are embarrassing hot microphone moments, and there are infuriating episodes when the quiet part is said out loud and amplified to an unintended public audience. It happened to Andy Griffith’s Lonesome Rhodes in the classic film A Face in the Crowd, ending his populist political and, at least, temporarily, his television broadcasting career. Since...
Dismissing the source is a genetic fallacy. They comment on someone else creating a fallacy and cant see their own. Their cognitive dissonance is in over drive
I mean, things take time. The Drudge Report wasn’t wrong about Monica, he was just an asshole. Assholes can be right and still refer to facts but present those facts in a different ideological context.
but I clearly was never going to get through to you.
Snopes confirmedthe video’s authenticity with the videographer who shot it. However, the audio was too distorted to definitively confirm the specifics of the conversation.
Even Snopes says its authentic you fucking moron, but I guess it’s “nothing more than AI” whatever.
False. Unrated because they could not hear what was said… Almost exactly like I said about half-truths, half-lies, distortion of context, etc. Just another straw-man fallacy, for I never denied the video existing (that doesn’t mean jack shit).
I’m getting upset lmao dude, sorry that you’re desperately trying to ragebait me. Sorry that calling a fucking moron a fucking moron makes people think you’re mad lmao
lmao, jesus. Sorry I asked you to read and ripped a hole in your pulled out of your ass AI theory.
They don’t have a history of making shit up. They have a history of being extremely biased. This video has no commentary.
Soooooo no other source beside some shithole far-right subpar slop?
Last chance!
Sure, no other source, except for the video and hot mic recording of her saying exactly what’s being reported here.
Here’s another news source, which includes the actual recording.
But of course, we can all see that truth is not what you’re actually after here.
Oh I’m sure there’s plenty of sources here for this obviously surreptitiously recorded video. /s
Dismissing the source when the facts are real is in, a word, stupid.
Why don’t you prove to me they have a history of making shit up? Oh yeah, because your own source proves that wrong, ding-a-ling.
Dismissing the source is a genetic fallacy. They comment on someone else creating a fallacy and cant see their own. Their cognitive dissonance is in over drive
LOW CREDIBILITY
Should be easy to find a better source reporting on this, if vetted! Hell, even Fox News!
I mean, things take time. The Drudge Report wasn’t wrong about Monica, he was just an asshole. Assholes can be right and still refer to facts but present those facts in a different ideological context.
but I clearly was never going to get through to you.
Cool buddy, just wake me up when that happens ;)
Not even Snopes could verify it.
Even Snopes says its authentic you fucking moron, but I guess it’s “nothing more than AI” whatever.
False. Unrated because they could not hear what was said… Almost exactly like I said about half-truths, half-lies, distortion of context, etc. Just another straw-man fallacy, for I never denied the video existing (that doesn’t mean jack shit).
Look at you, getting so upset.
I’m getting upset lmao dude, sorry that you’re desperately trying to ragebait me. Sorry that calling a fucking moron a fucking moron makes people think you’re mad lmao
You have done nothing but shift goalposts.