• hperrin@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Basically the advantage is that it’s ridiculously easy to set up. You just install the app and open it. The downside is that it’s ad-hoc. It’s not meant to be a long running server like smb.

      • undefinedTruth@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d argue LocalSend is a lot simpler. Install the app on both devices, open it, transfer files. Zero configuration needed in the majority of cases.

        • hperrin@lemmy.caOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          There’s no configuration needed for QuickDAV either, and it works on anything with a browser. You could transfer files to your Nintendo DS. ;)

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    KDEConnect is honestly going to be better. It’s runs on everything (yes, Gnome and Cinnamon), has transport and device security, and offers more than just file transfer.

  • Little8Lost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    “go to another machine on your LAN”
    So its basically syncthing?
    But that its not able to decide who gets whick file as there is only one option to log in in QuickDAV?
    But maybe more intuitive?