

deleted by creator


deleted by creator


Imagine seeing records like this breaking every summer and still denying climate breakdown.


When my butler read this to me, I couldn’t contain my outrage.


Almost makes you wonder why the CIA keeps getting into bed with them, if that’s the case.


It’s not an illegal bribe, if we legalise it and call it lobbying. *taps head


Imo, the reason trump went along with it is because mossad have trump’s kompromat.


I mean, we’ve barely started. I don’t think it’s time to think about when we should stop. But, if we have to, it’ll be when it’s finished.


They do have these programs but they barely scratch the surface or even contra the damage currently being done to the communities in question.
It’s not exactly easy but it’s not exactly impossible either. Of course, not you necessarily, someone could keep declaring it impossible to do no matter much the subject is researched.
For example, we can see that the communities effected by this have had far less investment than places that benefitted. The way to fix a severe lack of investment is through significant investment. There’ll be more, of course, but that’s an easy one right there.


Arming and radicalising traumatised people and setting them against people you don’t like is quite the American staple.


That’s how you deal with terrorists.


deleted by creator


Because American and other intelligence agencies was and still is using the kompromat to blackmail people.


When the genocide happened. I thought that was obvious.


They had private enterprise. So, In what way were they not capitalist? Imperial colonial economies are capitalist, by nature.


Tbf, i dont think they could name all of the African American slaves or the millions killed in the DRC.
You know the drill: Ukrainian starvation genocide = crime of communism.
When the Turkish capitalist empire does the same to Armenians, that’s just one of those things. Feels kinds commie though.


And it’s not like we aren’t all going to replace “redacted” with Trump, in every instance it would fit anyway.


Because governments don’t tax and then spend. This is a deliberate lie from certain sections of the political spectrum. Governments create money, spend it and then use taxation to offset the inflationary effect the money creation has on the economy, less the deficit.
It’s not debt, in the way we would experience it. The debt is actually of human labour which the population works off and is paid for. Money is human-labour standard, as opposed to gold or oil standard, if you actually look how it works in the real world and not dusty academic journals.


Why do you think that?


It’s just as implausible as vaccines causing autism. So, I had some fun with it, presuming you’re calling me a “dreamer” and you’re not referring to something called “sci-fi dreamer.”
If the CEOs didn’t do it, the shareholders would ruin their lives.