

Extremes is true and also very location dependent, but anyone making 200k in the u.s. also has insurance and a retirement package.


Extremes is true and also very location dependent, but anyone making 200k in the u.s. also has insurance and a retirement package.


…they did though?


Sounds familiar. Drunk xenophobe unc shit right here.


With this kind of blatant xenophobia and bigotry you’d fit right in with maga.


Ya, it’s impossible. The problem is that one persons “mindless nonsense” is anothers “contributing meaningfully”. In that sense the “I disagree” button just becomes the “I disagree with this because it’s mindless nonsense” and the world keeps spinning around.
In short, lol this ^.


Remember all those times that trump pardons didn’t have an effect on state charges? This is like that, except that Luigi is handsome and cool and jet skiing with me at the lake that time nothing happened.


Everyone running around straight up chomped on, half cocked. It is known. The xenophobes call it right again.


Believing in inferior DNA would put you in better company amongst them than merely being born. Food for thought.


It sure sounded like you misunderstood. But yes, killing kids is bad.


The warning sirens were expected from the base not to the base. Jfc.


That would sound way cooler if you weren’t so uninformed. Honestly, it still sounded pretty cool ngl.


You said he just ignored the supreme court and that’s not what happened.


Well, it is still using entanglement. It’s just not using it to transmit the data. More like a checksum.


The fiber is there because the data is being sent through the fiber as photons like usual. There is no zero latency happening at all and it will not allow rovers to be controlled remotely in real time. That would break causality. This has more to do with encryption and the inability to wiretap without detection.


Been working great for my group. I think the criticism for the open source options is over played. And so is the monetization angle for creators with fluxer, avenues for that bridges a lot of gaps for adoption.


That’s a really weird thing to say because you posted a source that provided statistics beyond the military survey, which pointedly proved that statement false.
Then you denied saying that the military was the only source when that fact was pointed out.
But you are now trippling down on that false claim.
It seems like you might have the inability to admit fault and truly apologize. Which is also what you are accused others of.
Might be time to take a break a question some preconceived notions. Like, no hate. You are on one right now. 20 percent of people are not who you think they are. It’s probably healthy to realize that.


I am a detractor who read these sources. You can too if you have any interest in the subject.
The first one does not mention statistics at all, just describes why you shouldn’t call people narcisistits because it has a specific definition that is overly applied. Ironically enough.
The second source does mention some statistics. But actually verifies the questions that were raised by other curious folks. It states that only .5 percent of the population experiences NPD and that 20 percent of the military does.
This verifies that the military survey is NOT the only source of statistics and that 20 percent of every one you meet doesn’t necessarily “lack empathy”.
So, a relief, I suppose, for now.
Although, the claim that anyone who questions a random internet comment are all the same person and are definitely controlling narcissistic a holes has not been verified.
But it’s probably true. I will not look any further into it for fear of self reflection.


Yes you did, it was like a big point you made and doubled down on. But ok.
That source didn’t verify that claim, either. And the other source doesn’t mention statistics at all.
Nevertheless, you are right that goodbyes are in order.


First source says .5 percent of the population and 20 percent of the military. Which is exactly what you were questioned about.
1. The military is a biased sample.
2. The military is not the only source of statistics.
Also, kind of a shit source that doesn’t appear to reference anything, to be fair.
That is only one of many different sections. And it is just a pilot program for loans.