He was also part of a WhatsApp group involving some of the United States’ most powerful business leaders with the stated goals of “changing the narrative” in favour of Israel and “helping win the war” against Gaza.
Doesn’t the Russian regime support Palestine and advocate against Israel? Doesn’t add up.
You can set up a WhatsApp↔Matrix bridge
Natural gas power plants are one of the most efficient and clean in terms of COP.
It was mentioned in the post. Doesn’t seem to be in apt.
Thanks, seems it worked. It should be noted that /dev/ over normal /run/media/ path can be found with lsblk command, out of 2 with identical letter use latter with digit
Can be huge for developing countries where doctors are constantly understaffed. These AIs rivaling with American doctors make them on average more qualified than people currently employed there.
Based on Microsoft’s proprietary OOXML format and still makes you dependent on Microsoft’s will. LibreOffice better.
Why are only some executable and source code file formats blocked? Wouldn’t it make sense to also block Python, Pascal, Fortran, MatLab, JS, TS, BF, ELF, A, B, C, C++, C#, D files?
Malware distributors would find another way, and broad restrictions would only frustrate legitimate users.
Just don’t read spoilers
DEXP microwave, it just runs down normally, no conversion happens
FFMPEG in the command line generally has permission to access the entire non-sudo filesystem and delete files.
How does a method being traditional make it more ethical? Aren’t more ethical methods of hunting about minimising agony of an animal when killed using all available technology? So a firearm shot would be more ethical than slow-to-kill arrow?
I remember stumbling upon this post as one of the first when sorting this community by some normal criteria. A month old is not too old, back on Reddit I once responded to a comment 9 to 10 years old, posted back when I was a child, and the author still responded.
General-purpose AI isn’t able to function reliably without a human driving it.
Right now it isn’t. But it’s getting more reliable with time, and a day may come when it will make less mistakes than humans do. And there will be no need for a human in the loop.
@remindme@mstdn.social 20 years
The hell happened with this instance?
In year 2000 poll, percentage of pro-choice people was 49% among both men and women. In 2006 it was 51% for both. Since 1995 and until 2020, the difference never exceeded 8%, peaking at 20% in 2025 correlating with political polarisation, with year 2010 men responding more pro-choice than women respondents by 5% (47% vs. 42%)‡.
Partisan divide was always more influential than the gender one, with pro-choice stance being 47% less popular among republican women than among democratic women; 42% gap for R/D men in 2020–2021 poll‡. If cisgender men could give birth, it wouldn’t have more influence on their abortion stance than overall political beliefs.
‡ Gender Gaps on Abortion Reach Historic Highs | Gallup, June 2025
It asks for your phone number, so it can’t be truly private.