

This is completely unfeasible. Convincing a bunch of people won’t cut it. For this to work, you’d need to rule the whole world with an iron fist, and then there’d still be secret resistance research labs everywhere.


This is completely unfeasible. Convincing a bunch of people won’t cut it. For this to work, you’d need to rule the whole world with an iron fist, and then there’d still be secret resistance research labs everywhere.


Surely they’re gonna build a robot police force with no oil, no gallium, and no robot factories.
I predict a 2035 with no europe.
(Although I do like the idea of being a criminal commanding hundreds of robots. The republican space cops with their slave armies and idealism magic would hate me. CIS ftw.)


Usa leans more towards no rights for anyone except the owning class members


I have a solution its called china
They have solar panels those neither use water nor produce co2/ch4, they can train the AI (the energy-intensive part)
Then you download the AI from the internet and can use it 100000x and it will use less energy than a washing machine, and neither consume water nor produce co2/ch4


Online models probably use even less than local ones, since they will likely be better optimized, and run on dedicated hardware.


Licenses like GPL were made to destroy copyright from the inside


The newer the line, the better the rocm, but I think the base 9060 is like 8GB 160W $250
Of course there is AI on linux. I installed it. What isn’t there is AI that the user doesn’t want.


You don’t need a license to look at stuff.


It would need to load every part of the model from disk into ram for every token it generates. This would take ages.
What you can do, however, is quantize the model. If you, for example, quantize a 16-bit model into 4-bit, its storage and ram requirements will go down to 1/4. While the calculations will still be in 16-bit, the weights will lose some accuracy.


To steal data, it needs to be deleted off the target’s computer. DMCA is stealing. Copying is not.


GPL was made to destroy the oppressive bourgeois copyright system from the inside, not to expand copyright even further.


Its already settled. AI training is considered “fair use”, therefore compliant with copyright.
Still, death to copyright.
We have harnessed the power of intelligence in our own machines by replicating a part of the brain. The intelligence is artificial, making it “Artificial Intelligence”. The name is exactly what it does.
You claim to know that it can never be art? If art had limits, it wouldn’t be art.


I like science. Science has shown that communism (for proletariat) and neoliberalism (for bourgies) are most effective and I dont see a lot of bourgies here.
Liberalism and stuff are like miasma theory or newton physics, outdated and incorrect.
(I think the left-right stuff is a distraction. Where is communism? On the left with the radlibs? No. On the right with the monarchists? No. There is no sliding scale between liberalism and communism as they are completely incompatible with each other.)
At first I didn’t like the idea of a name change. But WLBR is perfect (because I’m a wilbur fan).