Time for united European army. With better coordination, Europe can have stronger army even with the same funding.

Sure nothing wrong can result from that. /s

According to Ken Wilber, Bill Clinton said that the problem of Middle East is that less than 2% of world population is integral (on the integral level of consciousness). So it would be nice if more people would understand than and agree.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integral_theory#Levels_or_stages

A classical sign of an early worldcentric worldview that is more about competition than about collaboration. A level “orange” in Integral theory. But humankind is continuing its development to late worldcentric worldview “green” level and more. And Fediverse is helping with that!

Deja vu 🤔

Definitely !longevity@mander.xyz and (ironically) !cryonics@lemmy.world. This is literally a matter of life and death!

Also for the language !esperanto@sopuli.xyz and my home country !slovakia@sopuli.xyz, but revival there is already kind of happening.

Next good reason to leave from there 👍

I would rather suggest to gift apples.

Close. Esperanto speaker ☺️

Sincerely, what one can attend from such closed company…

Is there any relation to “nanogram” that was supposed to use the cryptocurrency Nano ($XNO)? Or you just liked the name? 🤔

What would world do without furries? ☺️

Then catgirl ears are enough 😉

Inspiration for many more governments!

I have already contacted my, Slovakian government. I should ping them again 😅

Or get a catgirl ears. And safer memory.

Nice thing would be to have a structured way to clearly present differences between communities of same name. Eg. possibility to link (in machine readable way) in sidebar to other communities and mark them as pure duplicates, or state the actual difference. This information could show also in search and crosspoting dialog.

Technically yes. The problem would be how to decide which community put in spotlight and which in grey (or any other meaningful distinction). Would it be automatic (if yes, how to decide the algorithm), or manual (if yes, how to decide how to left them). These things can be discussed out and solved, but we should be aware that these questions are here.

And it would work only for real duplicates of communities, not healthy separated communities based on actual, conscious and cherished differences.

Technically, I agree.

Practically, I myself have experienced several fragmented communities about the same topic with similar ethos. This was not a healthy separation based on different norms. It was simple, ineffective fragmentation. Or, at least the ethos and norms differences wasn’t clear.

I don’t know with whom you interact in Mastodon, but this in definitely not my experience there.