This is good. However, I’m sure he has other fuckery up his sleeve. Expect him to continue attacking mail-in ballots at the USPS level as well as other intimidation tactics. He knows his survival is at stake, and never underestimate a rat backed into a corner.
Except for the failure part. It should read there’s no limits to his failure. I’m going to go eat my trump steak now and study for my trump university class. Oh wait, those things failed.
The rest of the article is correct, he hasn’t learned his lesson yet. Malignant narcissists never do.
I never said the DNC had 60. I said Obama had a supermajority for four months.
You are technically correct about the strict party label, but I never argued that or stated that in my reply. I simply said Obama had a supermajority for four months, even if only technically.
Sanders and Lieberman formally caucused with the Democrats. In the U.S. Senate, caucusing means you organize with that party to determine leadership, committee assignments, and—most importantly—the voting threshold needed to break a filibuster.
So I’m technically correct, which is the best kind of correct.
Where did I ever say the DNC specifically had 60?
The Democrats had 60 votes for a cumulative total of about four months (broken into two periods between July 2009 and February 2010). However, even within that window, the supermajority was practically compromised. Senator Ted Kennedy was battling a terminal illness and was frequently absent, and Senator Robert Byrd was often hospitalized, meaning Democrats rarely had all 60 votes present.
True, but he only had that supermajority for four months
“Obama shit my pants”
1776 in the United States - Wikipedia https://share.google/U6reJSDH6n4EBePmQ
And they’ll still have more representation due to our antiquated electoral college