- 0 Posts
- 3 Comments
itrealgood@mander.xyzto
World News@lemmy.world•Mark Zuckerberg wants Meta to launch its own prediction marketEnglish
3·3 days agodeleted by creator
itrealgood@mander.xyzto
News@lemmy.world•Chinese supercomputer leapfrogs best US machines to be ranked world’s fastest
61·3 days agodeleted by creator
itrealgood@mander.xyzto
Fediverse@lemmy.world•If you are coming from Reddit: YSK that Lemmy and Piefed have no karma. Don't delete your posts.English
4·9 days agodeleted by creator
itrealgood@mander.xyzto
politics @lemmy.world•JD Vance went on the view and got absolutely torn to shreds by middle-aged women
27·10 days agodeleted by creator
itrealgood@mander.xyzto
politics @lemmy.world•Trump Celebrates While America Capitulates | The peace deal with Tehran is an Iranian victory.
21·12 days agodeleted by creator
itrealgood@mander.xyzto
politics @lemmy.world•Trump Celebrates While America Capitulates | The peace deal with Tehran is an Iranian victory.
514·13 days agodeleted by creator
itrealgood@mander.xyzto
politics @lemmy.world•Trump Celebrates While America Capitulates | The peace deal with Tehran is an Iranian victory.
318·13 days agodeleted by creator
itrealgood@mander.xyzto
World News@lemmy.world•Palantir boss Karp builds giant villa in Liechtenstein – this raises questions in the principalityEnglish
1·13 days agodeleted by creator
itrealgood@mander.xyzto
science@lemmy.world•Globally, 1 in 3 cancer cases may never be diagnosedEnglish
3·28 days agoThis is modeling based and although it does aim to factor in population aging effects, it does not account for the rapidly improving quality and accessibility of diagnostics.
Non-invasive diagnostic technologies are being developed ridiculously fast. Many are getting really cheap as well. Although I agree with the article that diagnostics should be made more accessible throughout the world, it is simultaneously important to realise that we do seem to be making that attainable.
Finally, there is also the problem of over-diagnosis. At a false positive rate of 0.0001, one in ten thousand people may incorrectly be diagnosed. On a population scale, that becomes problematic. So the problem might very well change from ‘we are failing to diagnose 1/3 people with cancer’ to ‘we are telling one in 10000 people without cancer that they have cancer’. At this point it is very hard to tell which it is going to be.
itrealgood@mander.xyzto
Technology@lemmy.world•The Netherlands just blocked a US company from buying the app Dutch citizens use for everythingEnglish
4·29 days agodeleted by creator
itrealgood@mander.xyzto
politics @lemmy.world•Why Trump isn’t bothering to hide his corruption
22·1 month agodeleted by creator
itrealgood@mander.xyzto
science@lemmy.world•Coal pollution is cutting solar power outputEnglish
15·1 month agodeleted by creator
itrealgood@mander.xyzto
News@lemmy.world•Amsterdam bans public adverts for meat and fossil fuels
15·2 months agoIf companies need advertisements to inform potential customers, let them do that in an appropriate place. For instance, an adds booklet.
Allowing companies to use the public space to advertise is not in the interest of the populace: it stimulates overconsumption and it creates distracting stimuli in an environment that is already very busy. It also facilitates unfair competition when advertising space is sold to the highest bidder, since company wealth supersedes product quality or utility.
Not to be disagreeable, just out of interest: what do you think a conservative party would expect to gain? I suppose it might be an attempt to propagate a stereotype?