Studies like this have already been done. It doesn’t matter what demographic you belong to, except one, you get what you want about a third of the time.
That last demographic is donors; they get what they want over 90% of the time.
Mystery long solved. But, good science is repeatable, so keep going for the sake of rigor.
Arguably, it started with Nixon.
The World Trade Center was destroyed by Al Quaeda terrorists. There’s a lot of evidence which suggests many wealthy people knew it would happen beforehand and made moves to profit from it.
A massive amount of extremely high-risk puts were purchased against the only two airlines involved in the attacks. Every one of them ended paying out.
There’s also the fact that Building 7 and the section of the Pentagon targeted by the attacks were storing the evidence and personnel involved in the world’s largest financial crimes investigations.
The conspiracy isn’t what happened, it’s who knew it would happen and who benefitted from it.
It’s not the coal that makes it that hot. Anybody can ignite a normal coal fire in their grill and it won’t get hot enough to forge. The critical component of a blacksmith’s forge is the ability to force additional air, and thus, oxygen, into the fire.
I think this lends a lot more credibility to the idea that the two halves of ancient humans’ brains weren’t connected (called the “bicameral mind”), and references to “gods” during that time period were hallucinations from the disconnected half.
References to “the gods abandoning me/us” were people describing what it was like to experience the two halves connect, leading to the disappearance of the hallucinations.
References to searching for people who are “still connected to the gods” means they’re looking for people who still have a bicameral mind and experience the hallucinations.
Easy fix. Just do like everyone else and lie. The truth doesn’t matter anymore.
An apostrophe always takes the place of other letters. “It’s” (the contraction) always means “it is”. The possessive form of “it” is always “its”.
Yes, it matters. Yes, I knew what was intended based on context this time, but context isn’t always available or reliable. The only way to be sure you won’t be misunderstood is to follow the same rules as everyone else every time.
people ignored it
Maybe you and your friends did. My friends and I didnt.
Are you an American? Are you talking to Americans? The Guardian is corporate-owned propaganda.
What exactly do YOU think LLMs are?
Machine Learning is a kind of AI. LLMs are but one kind of Machine Learning Model. All LLMs are Machine Learning models, but not all Machine Learning models are LLMs. LLMs are one kind of AI, but not all AI is an LLM.
They’re different words for a reason. If they were all the same thing, we wouldn’t give them different names. It’s completely possible and understandable that someone would find one acceptable but not the other.
Sources:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Machine_learning
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_language_model
There’s nothing quite so uniquely irritating as someone who holds a strong opinion on something about which they know very little.
Marissa Tomei > Mariska Hargitay > Milli Vanilli
They kinda do. There are five possible causes of death: homicide, suicide, accidental, natural causes, and unknown. All deaths not determined to be accidental or natural require a police investigation.
(fingers in ears)
“LA LA LA! CHINA GOOD! LA LA LA!”
That’s what you sound like.
Don’t forget glazing the GTA 6 trailer
Physical media also comes with a license.
licenses are a very IT central idea.
No, that’s just the implementation you’re most familiar with. Licenses are a copyright idea that IT adopted and made digital. Every physical movie and game you own also comes with a license that authorizes your retail use of it, but forbids your commercial use of it. You can’t rent your copy of Shrek out to people, nor can you charge admission to people to watch Shrek at your house, nor are you allowed to make copies of your Shrek DVD and sell them, for example.
Ben Franklin was very progressive for his time. He owned a few slaves early in his life, but soon freed them and spent the rest of his life as one of that time period’s most outspoken critics of slavery. He even bought a printing press so he could spread anti-slavery rhetoric more effectively.
You have internet, there’s no excuse for being wrong unless you just like spreading misinformation.
All of that sounds unintuituve and complicated, which I think is the main complaint overall.
Polymarket and crypto have some people believing they’re only three days from being a millionaire
Yes, I’m aware of what the official report says. The FBI only concluded they couldn’t prove any connection to terrorism.
Every mathematician and data analyst the SEC hired to look at the trades said they were indistinguishable from trades made on advance knowledge. Despite this, the SEC concluded in their findings the trade patterns were “coincidence”. To this day, the portions of the report detailing the SEC’s basis for their conclusion remains classified or so heavily redacted as to only offer conclusionary information.
So, the SEC looked at all the evidence indicating advance knowledge, handwaved it, said it didn’t actually mean exactly what the experts said, then provided “trust me bro” as their only source. To me, that’s about as believable as Epstein killing himself. But if that’s good enough to count as proof in your mind, go ahead and believe what you want, no judgment from me.
The only sad thing here is how you treat people you disagree with.