Did… Did you read the article?

I don’t know why you’re being downvoted, but you’re right. SpaceX made a lot of advancements on its rockets and in lowering the price per launch.

This is objective. This isn’t sentimental or arguable.

Fr. That was a hard look.

Poor kitty 😞

Love it.

It’s fine-tuned Kimi 2.5

They didn’t train this up for themselves.

It’s an OK model that is fast and cheap. It outperforms other models of the same price class, but it’s nowhere near Frontier model capability.

Lol did they create the image with AI as well?

A chart with a line going downwards to the left hand side as the chart rises to the right is completely wrong.

Anthropic literally ran the exact same marketing campaign with opus 4.

Same sensationalist headlines.

Firefox is partially in this position because the community really does not support Firefox. Every decision Firefox makes or Mozilla makes in an attempt to try and claw back their financial freedom away from Google, the community dumpsters them on. Then, on posts like this, the community turns around and dumpsters Firefox for being so financially dependent on Google.

FireFox was and is an awesome project, but unfortunately, without the financial backing of a large for-profit business, they cannot keep up with Chrome. Even then, FireFox, with an engineering team a quarter the size of Chrome’s, still manages to keep up, which is a god damn miracle.

Developing a browser that is fast, actually works with new web standards, stays up to date, and is adding features is incredibly difficult. It is a stupidly expensive endeavor, similar to the level of effort necessary for operating systems.

And unfortunately, there is no Linux equivalent for web browsers, at least not right now. There are some up-and-coming projects, but it’s going to be decades before they reach the level of maturity necessary to start competing against Chrome. At which point there may be so much standards capture that some of these browsers may find it impossible to actually catch up.

You know, I seem to see this rhetoric a lot, and it seems to be getting upvoted more now, which isn’t a good sign for Lemmy, but are you really surprised by this? Is this really a question? Are you really that under a rock?

If it’s rhetorical, then what’s the point? Is this just a petulant way to try and dumpster something without going through the effort of actually picking out a real problem with it, of which there are countless?

Is this starting an interesting discussion? Is this voicing an interesting opinion? What is the point of this exact kind of comment?

Maybe I’m just too autistic and I’m going off the rails here, but these are starting to itch like a form of “internet forum hives”.

In all sadness, folks on Lemi and other more technically inclined forums infight even more than leftists infight, and all they do is sabotage themselves.

Projects like Firefox are mountains above Chrome when it comes to privacy and not ceding web control over to Google. Yet any thread about anything Firefox is doing is just filled with FUD from people complaining about small individual changes or Firefox not being perfect enough, so on and so forth.

It’s self-sabotage. If you didn’t think Firefox is good enough, congratulations. Now you’ve got Chrome, and pretty soon you won’t have Firefox.

😒

So, they are giving everyone a cut, effectively.

Not giving a raise means that everyone loses to inflation, so everyone essentially gets a pay cut for the privilege to continue working for this company.

It’s a classic knee jerk from commenters who don’t know what they are talking about.

A tale as old as time.

… What?

Are you drinking your grandma’s bath water again?

It’s a lot more than just video. It’s all your audio while you’re in the car. Your driving habits, your location, your devices, who is in the car with you so on and so forth.

There’s a ton of data that can be gathered and associated without having to have a camera.

If you ever talk in your car and it’s a modern car. Congratulations! That’s being recorded cataloged and sold off to the highest bidder.

That’s the point. This is just a foot in the door to block your access to print things that might be trademarked copyrighted or affiliated with your corporate overlords.

And a foot in the door to start blocking your right to repair your own things.

Guaranteed.

90%?

More like 99.999%

Including op.

There’s a difference between building a pile of crap and actually building something that works effectively. It’s a difficult hardware and software problem.

Exposed endpoints that have no authentication and various other things like that.

It’s application level security issues.

If there is an older collation here https://github.com/jellyfin/jellyfin/issues/5415

Yes for yourself on a device that supports it but that doesn’t address what my post stated.

The devices that I listed in my post are still going to run to the same problem in that sense that you’re not going to be able to run tailscale on them either.

It is incredibly difficult to get jelljfin ypen into your friends or your parents or grandparents house without considerable setup and maintenance over time.

And effectively none of the Jellyfin clients support this…

So that’s not going to work anyways on your friend’s TV or their Xbox or their Roku or something else like that.

Problem is access outside your home for family and friends.

There are serious security gaps that make it a non starter to expose to the internet.

I’ve been using Jellyfin ever since they forked out of Emby, and honestly, it’s the biggest complaint that I have. It is incredibly difficult to make it available to friends and family who are on various devices, networks, so on and so forth.

Whereas Plex “just works.”