Vandalism and property damage is not violence.

Drawing a weapon on nonviolent protesters is a threat of violence.

That’s if they even make it all the way to trial.

https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2019/06/11/only-2-of-federal-criminal-defendants-go-to-trial-and-most-who-do-are-found-guilty/

I think to an extent. But at the same time, I remember the white pages and when I was growing up the school gave every parent a directory with all the phone numbers for everyone in the school so they could call their classmates if they missed an assignment.

In a local setting, it does make a community stronger. But there is a problem with the Internet and the global reach.

Debtors prisons are pretty terrible and hurt the vulnerable.

Remove a lot of the legal separation between a corporation and those that own and run it. Make the owners and leadership liable and don’t stop at the articles of incorporation.

The company has 20k in assets. The money paid for the original work has already been spent on various “consultants” and other nontangible expenses. Many to people or companies that only exist on paper and all funnel back to a few individuals.

The company is found liable, but doesn’t have the resources to pay for restorations and folds. No money is ever returned. No repairs are made. The $14m is “gone” in the bank accounts of the corrupt.

A new pool company is opened, the assets from the first are sold at bargain prices to the new to liquidate it’s measly assets to satisfy courts and bankruptcy requirements. All are ready for a new grift.

“allegedly gunned down”

FTFY

Right?! This stuff could be so powerful and useful, but instead everything needs to connect to some fucking cloud. If we had any data sovereignty, we could have all the cool stuff. Local processing with local data. No uploading.

Like making us batteries or slaves. Yea… Can’t have an ai save us from ourselves

0. A robot may not injure humanity or, through inaction, allow humanity to come to harm.
1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm.
2. A robot must obey the orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law.
3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.

Hell, that would motivate me to design a whole new plastic cover for the a pillar and remove the cameras entirely.

I’d have called an employment lawyer. That can easily be discrimination for some medical conditions like crohns or IBS.

I second this. It’s health and safety related. You don’t want to have it break at the exact moment it’s needed.

Life alert or something similar is the solution.

I think your right. Even dumber then.

I don’t know why they keep using the idiotic looking down portrait of him for everything. He looks so insecure, like he’s trying to be tough and failing.

It gets more accurate with more access points, too. So corporate and education settings will be the easy places for this to get implemented.

Last I looked, jellyfin auth and public facing security were less than ideal.

How far has that come in the last few years? I have plenty of people using my Plex and it’s been secure. I had heard a public facing Jellyfin wasn’t super secure.

Honestly, 95% of the reason I use Plex is so I don’t have to manage user passwords and troubleshoot issues for my friends and family. I just grant access.

Republicucks always said they were fiscally conservative. It’s always been what they touted as a defining characteristic when you took idealogy tests.

Turns out, that was all lip service. At least for the last few decades.

I have, on multiple occasions paid an an amount that would have someone give me $5 back in change or exact cents, then had them be utterly confused and have to pull out a calculator.

But like, if the total is 17.75, and I hand them $22.75. I’m expecting the person to be able to figure out I’m making it simpler for them.

In the US, a portion of that fine goes back to the police departments. Giving them a financial incentive to give tickets.

If the fines went to anything except the people giving the fines, then it could work here. But we were so stupid to couple the two in the first place.

Too close to the election! Meanwhile lousiana is like… Fuck that, we’re shutting down the election that’s already having early voting because fuck you.