

After his fellas have demonstrated plain and clear that “recorded and reported” means nothing as long as you have enough money?
Haaa, go on and try that


After his fellas have demonstrated plain and clear that “recorded and reported” means nothing as long as you have enough money?
Haaa, go on and try that
Exactly my feelings. Software dev, get paid more than many people who actually keep others alive, healthy, educated and comfortable. This is not how things should be


Cherry on top: this gets into court, and judge goes “it’s all woman’s fault, jail her for life”


One good thing AI bubble did: it showed me we have so many rich idiots that it is an actual problem


That makes more of us. Educated - of course, but also allowed.


Come on. Am I dreaming?


Guess he didn’t rape enough children then


K, now make any and all drugs legal


Wait, you mean client-side anticheat is not some holy unbreakable barrier? I am shocked (sarcasm)


it’s one vote per dollar instead of one vote per person.
Damn that is well-said


Someone please post the reminder about the voting


All that happened was systemd management going “this politically motivated change is ok, that politically motivated change is not ok”. No amount of “dis is opshionall” is going to change them being idiots at best and agents of ill will at worst


Nah. What is funny is a pull-request explicitly stating compliance with age verification laws getting merged and then revert refused with a “don’t bring this discussion here” argument. This is where Lennart has lost me, with that bullshit of an excuse


Oh no, “child protection” was never about protecting children? I am shocked, shocked



Being half a world away from Americas is pretty easy, don’t ya think?


To be fair, I am bit split on this. On one hand, name and shame is an effective strategy and should be used. On the other hand, “put age verification into Linux” is a hilarious stretch. And yes, it feels strange that I have yet to see any kind of response from other systemd maintainers and managers - after all, the man authored a pull-request, not merged into into upstream. I have not been looking for that kind of response myself though, which also serves your point: putting all the blame and anger on this one man (I purposefully omit name) is too much
Same. Unless I live like a hermit in the woods, I am definitely using, directly or not, something (many things) made by a company that has done unforgivable shit. And even if I personally decide “to hell with all this, I can survive just fine”, who will be there to stop them from destroying the whole forest I am supposedly in? Definitely not me
This does not make things all right as they stand, but it does mean quitting the game is not an option