The difference between auto-generating hundreds to thousands of words, versus having to manually read and type all of those words out yourself is very obviously a lot more than “nothing”.

And that’s not even taking into account the fact that we don’t know what their method of watermarking is. From how they’re talking it sounds like it will be algorithmically embedded in the text itself somehow, through specific choices of words or something similar. If that’s the case, typing it out word for word will retain the watermark.

Kinda my own arse?

Correct.

this feels like something so obvious I’d think studies likely show this

Surprisingly unscientific attitude from a scifi author.

Sources?

You’re incoherent.

Don’t feed the trolls.

That’s totally fine, but don’t comment on the content of it in that case.

You literally engaged by commenting.

lot of people voting and commenting that didn’t read the article.

You didn’t read the article.

The entire Human Behavioural Biology unit lectures at Stanford, by the brilliant Robert Sapolsky, are online and they will change the way you understand yourself and others:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNnIGh9g6fA&list=PL848F2368C90DDC3D

It’ goes into some fairly deep science but is still very accessible, Sapolsky is a brilliant educator. His book Behave is basically these lectures in book form, the audiobook of it is on Spotify.

deleted by creator