

The video does not show the letters being removed as that did not happen yet. Since the original link is broken I cannot see the video in question.


The video does not show the letters being removed as that did not happen yet. Since the original link is broken I cannot see the video in question.


There is an ai generated video that’s show the letters being removed. Since the letters have not yet been removed there is no real video showing that.


It will be hard to find a Linux phone that does those things well as a daily driver.


This is misleading, there is no investigation. They just review some additional documents flagged by the public. So the strategy now is to release documents only when their existence can no longer be denied.


I read the comment to only refer to the way AI was used.


If I say I have notes on powerful people and say that empowers me, that’s bragging. Not blackmail, because those people might not even know. If I were to say it to those powerful people, it could be perceived as threatening. But it’s not blackmail, as I don’t demand anything. If I were to use those notes to get something done: that’s blackmail.


The NYT is just reporting what’s ‘fit to print’. Unless there’s verified proof of actual blackmail this description seems apt. Saying you have information on people and you may use it is not blackmail, as that would require a direct request.


When you read the article, it’s just that there is an appeal that’s unlikely to get picked up. Headline seems a bit hysterical.
Maybe you want to drive a car safely.