He’s too old.

What method of appointment would be better? I think there’s a whole host of issues with them, but I think most would be fixed simply with an 18 year term limit and some basic corruption laws

Emphasis on semi

Few things are impossible, but it’d definitely be a lot harder than you are imagining.

Wow hackerman should uhhh hack Facebook that’d be awesome they should do all these good things!

The screw up that your generation made was merely voting for the lesser evil, and not attempting to run and campaign for the furthest left people that would create real change. You don’t stop at voting for the lesser evil, you also push into the next election with the goal to shove them out

Every time we choose better. Every time we vote for someone who’s an improvement. We slowly drive this country further left as we pull nail and tooth to get the moderates to understand how much better everything could be

There are people who have been fighting against all this for decades. Don’t lump them together.

Pritzker. Relatively progressive. Pro union, pro building up housing, pro worker’s rights, pro higher minimum wage, unrestrained in his support of lgbtq, and yet still Measured and budget conscious, which helps him be more palatable to the big stage.

I think he’s the best possible option that still has a good chance to win.

Yup. Precisely why I advocate for a hard cap on age positioned around 65 rather than any form of test.

I’m a firm believer that the only qualification for elected office should be citizenship.

Dunny. I’ve mentioned it a few times. I don’t think they’re still removing them but I bet they are still suppressing them

Each of the 13 justices gets a 13 year term, each justice could serve up to two terms, consecutive or not,

Absolutely not. You NEED it to be one term, because judges should never have to rely on approval of others for their jobs. The only reason they should be able to be removed after appointment is a severe ethics violation.

too many people to vote for means no one knows anything about who they’re voting for.

I think some appointments are fine, but they should never be soley appoint able by 1 branch/person. I3, congress should be able to put forth their own cabinet options type of thing

It’s far worse than that. The judiciary is able to be fired by the executive branch and that simply should not be possible.

I feel the checks on the supreme court is close. I think with 18 year ish terms to replace 1 every every 2 years consistently would work

If you’re in intelligence.services, security should be a priority. You can also just have phones at work.

They could literally just leave their phones at home.

The fact that the french don’t even have basic countermeasures to prevent this is as hilarious as it is depressing . It wouldn’t even be hard.

Sounds pretty based to do that to a carrier ngl

“making policy”. Yes, the mayor. Who makes the laws. That mayor making policies.

For the comment higher towards you I really did mean that as a general clarification. I would’ve worded it more strongly otherwise. I wasn’t entirely sure if you realized it or not given your wording, so I wanted to make sure less familiar people reading on that were more clear.

The cherry picking comment was not to you, it was to their person it’s replied to. I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you just misread the comment chain