thank you, i think i saw that somwhere before. is it really true that the haressment is made up? like i honestly dont know

and does it really has an impact on the eco system? i never really thought abou it…

but i think it is also for privacy top. user control not tho

And i guess fair point that this is a security flaw considering the phone users beeing targeted… But like i still kinda think hardware backed security is important and also very crucial is, that the more devices they supporty the less recourses they have… I think considering how long it is since pixel 10 released and it is still not supported, would make me guess that they dont have like any free time really to do it at all ^^

and like there are also no relevant projects i think that fork it to other devices, so i dont know, i mean somebody could start doing that but i guess that shows how hard it is to do

sry but which parts are then FOSS about it, compared to pixel?

or do you just mean google itself? (which i would understand i guess)

where is the screaming happening then, if you dont even see it in the offical forum

I think if it does not meet the requierments then they wont support new phones at all, but who knows

GrapheneOs is calling them out for their lack of security. Like this one: https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/24134-devices-lacking-standard-privacysecurity-patches-and-protections-arent-private

i think this is a good thing, users should be aware of it. And they should fix it.

I wish someone would find flaws in grapheneOs, and complain so thex can fix it too. Instead of complaining about the personality of one of the directors.

but he isnt the lead developer he stepped down 2023 and is a director

https://discuss.privacyguides.net/t/daniel-micay-publicly-steps-down-as-project-leader-of-grapheneos/12677

Not sure why you write all that without mentioning that he stepped down as the project head after this.

Not sure why this completly made up hypothetical scenario has so many upvotes. There is litteraly no evidence of this happening.

Even the opposite is the case, just recently with the preview releases which are opt-in.

I am visiting the forum daily for like a year now, and this is just a made up lie.

-> make most secure os in the world

-> call others out for not keeping up with the security updates like e/os

-> french goverment decides to make security illegal and specifically targets graphene

-> e/os fanboys keep shitting on graphene

“This guy is way too dramatic”

yall the reason we cant have anything good.

Has fairphone 6 foss firmware? and foss drivers?

Before that GrapheneOS dismissed any idea of targeting other phones than the ones build by one of the most anti-privacy companies on earth, that seeks to consolidate control of Android.

Litteraly saya on the website the requirements that a phone has to meet. Go make the phone that meets them instead of only complaining.

deleted by creator

That is commonly referred to as beeing a hypocrite

Holy crap, and these people think they have right to talk about computers.

By your own logic, considering how you wrote your first comment, you should not have the right to talk at all

just read it again lmao

ah sry i always thought a generic account is something else,

like an account of some random person

generic account

? it is the project account

thank you, i dont know about economics like this that well

But what about debt? i think it is not part of the gdp, but i feel like it makes a difference… or does it really not matter?

I guess it is this? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_labour_productivity

seems more like it is just hours worked/ gdp

so not really sure if calling it more productive is really fitting…

essentially grapheneOs is just plain android, with additional security features/ hardening. It is said to be the most secure (normal) Os in the world.

And one of the nicest feature in my opinion is, that all the google stuff is optional. So play store and play service is just another app. (Instead of a system level privileged process)

And in my opinion, it is just the better operating system.

https://grapheneos.org/features

I think you, the question should be “why should i not get it” and the answer to this is if, you either need NFC payment (does not work (depending on bank)), or you dont want an app to ever not work, because some apps dont work on it (google play integrety check is the reason)

And it should be mentioned, that grapheneOs has one of the best web installer out there, it is easier to install then any linux distro. It was a dream really.

(and for switching the data transfer might be annoying)

that is just not true

https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/20464-is-grapheneos-the-most-secure-os-in-the-world/3

https://xcancel.com/GrapheneOS/status/1924509488435835206#m