I wish they could come up with something similar for repeat illegal parkers. I know an asshole who gets $1000 worth of parking tickets a month and doesn’t care because he is rich enough.

How do you know a house is not a public space? How do you know a bike is not public property? How do I know the restaurant expected me to wait to pay? We know because by default you do not have permission to do these things without explicit permission. The rights of the owner supercede the rights of a random member of the public by default. Private property law applies even if they private property has a public use.

We have a right to freedom of religion. That doesn’t mean I can erect a cross on the front lawn of a McDonalds just because there is no sign saying I can’t.

The court defends gun rights here in a way they would not defend any other constitutional right.

you are not burdened to proove you have a right, it the job of law enforment to prove you dont have it

This isn’t about private citizen rights vs the state. It’s private vs private rights. Private property owners do not have the same obligations to defend your civil rights as the state.

Remember that Hawaii is a castle doctrine state. People have a right to defend their home or place of work against intruders with lethal force. If someone can shoot armed intruders, you better believe it is in your best interest to check before entering a property.

Its the same reason you cant ban all gay people from the McDonalds you run. You either keep not reading this or keep ignoring it in your replies.

A private company can ban people for swearing or preaching or whatever type of speech even though you have a first amendment right. Race, age, sex, sexuality, and religion are procted classes specifically by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Gun carriers are NOT a protected class.

This is not about walking into a place armed without consent.

Correct. I think that in absence of consent it is absurd to default to remaining armed.

I can’t walk into an empty house whenever I want because there is no one to ask for consent. I can’t ride off with a bike left on the street because there is no owner around. I can’t leave a restaurant after eating because I can’t immediately find someone to give me a check. The default cannot be that your rights supersede others unless they are actively defending them. This is not about walking into a place armed without consent.

Assuming someone legally exercising a right they possess in a place they’re allowed to be is actually there to commit crimes is asanine.

That’s just it, you can only assume that person has the right to own the gun. For all you know they are on probation for gun crimes and shouldn’t have it. It’s on the gun owner to prove they aren’t a threat.

Moreover, how do you imagine someone to get consent from the McDonalds franchise owner before going inside?

Call ahead. Or just don’t carry the gun if you don’t know. Permission should not be assumed by default on private property.

The level of burden is similar to having to get consent from the owners of parking lots with no signs before even driving your car into one

The existence of a parking lot is a sign. It’s more like parking on someones lawn and then being surprised they are mad at you.

It flips the burden of responsibility. You have a second amendment right to carry a gun but with that right comes the responsibility of ensuring you do not violate others rights with it. If someone walks onto a property armed without consent, it is perfectly reasonable to assume that they have malicious intent. It is the responsibility of the gun owner to ensure others know they aren’t a threat.

IIRC this happened in Illinois as well. A female gorilla who had babies in the past picked up the boy, took him to the door to the enclosure, and patiently waited to hand him over to the zookeepers.

Long?

On his podcast, Job Favreau (the former Obama speechwriter) revealed that he was mistakenly invited to the event because they thought he was Jon Favreau the actor. They didn’t realize their mistake until he submitted his ID for a background check. Lol

The way it’s always worked is the president can’t unilaterally declare war. Let’s not pretend we are still bound by precedent or rules anymore.

To me it all depends if the hobby is about the prints or the printer. If you just want to make stuff with minimal tinkering and effort, Bambu is what you want. If you want to customize, tweak, optimize, etc, then Prusa or Elegoo are both solid choices.

So it’s 100% certain now that he is going to declare the election invalid to keep Republican majority control.

It’s exactly the same with Hillbilly Elegy and JD Vance. He hates the same system that got him to where he is. He needs to believe that he was a special snowflake and that he succeeded through his own superiority.

I love how most of the replies here are people spitballing ideas for fixing the government, as if there weren’t a bunch of nations who have already solved these problems which we could take inspiration from. Basically every democracy that was founded after us has looked at our mistakes and fixed them in one way or another.

I think it is fear, not hate. They fear trans people, Muslims, and immigrants. The left tells them this fear is their problem and they have to change. Trump tells them that not only is their fear justified, but that he can protect them from what they fear.

It’s not just Trump. It is the corruption of all Republican judges. They all should be disbarred at the very least.

There are a lot of people who think ability to make money equals superiority.

28% have been paid to say there isn’t too much money in politics.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/dnc-chair-grilled-over-why-160222861.html?guccounter=1

He’s super defensive in the interview. It definitely makes him look like he is trying to pull something shady.

The head of the DNC says they report was done by one person who worked for free. The theory I find most likely is that they just never completed it so there is nothing to release.