This is about it. If you can produce 2x output per worker you’re not going to give each worker half days, you’re going to cut down your workforce until supply once again matches demand. As this cycle repeats jobs become more and more competitive as workers fight for placements at these more efficient firms. They’ll pursue advanced degrees and extra certifications to stand out. This produces a lot of stuff, but ultimately creates a warped standard of living. Higher productivity ironically makes time spent not working or pursuing prerequisites to work more expensive.

That’s not how the economy works. Unless there’s no human work to do at all, most will just be pushed out of their comfier thinking jobs into physical labor jobs.

We absolutely have the resources to solve those distribution issues, there just isn’t an economic incentive to allocate them that way.

Neither are true, Micron has been plummeting since their earnings report on the 18th. This might have caused a small dip but it’s nothing compared to the cliff they just fell off of.

CXMT has ddr5 manufacturing capabilities but it will be years before they scale it, and they’re embargoed by the US, so nobody on good terms with the US can get it.

And yes, they would also sell to the enterprise customers, but it would lower prices overall.

They’ve been doing it since the start. OAI was fear mongering about how dangerous gpt2 was initially as an excuse to avoid releasing the weights, while simultaneously working on much larger models with the intent to commercialize. The whole “our model is so good even we’re scared of it” shtick has always been marketing or an excuse to keep secrets.

Even now they continue to use this tactic while actively suppressing their own research showing real social, environmental and economic harms.

I use this for it’s ability to simulate brightness levels lower than what the system will allow normally.

Could say the same for both