Key Points

  • Robot startup Foundation has failed to pay employees since missing its Oct. 30 payroll, angering some workers after its CEO borrowed $4.6 million from the firm last year to buy a luxury home, according to people familiar with the matter.
  • CEO and co-founder Sankaet Pathak is Foundation’s sole board member, raising governance concerns among prospective investors.
  • Foundation’s widely reported $24 million in Pentagon contracts actually stems from its 2024 acquisition of Boardwalk Robotics, which held some existing government research contracts, the people said.
  • Pathak’s previous company, Synapse, collapsed in 2024, leaving thousands of customers without access to deposits. Pathak reportedly took loans from Synapse as it neared bankruptcy.
  • Schmoo@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    13 minutes ago

    I don’t feel bad for anybody who willingly works for a murder-bot startup. I hope they never get a single paycheck.

  • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    23 minutes ago

    I know not everyone has lots of choices for jobs. But the people working in that field should. And they need to vote with their feet. Don’t work for shitty companies if you have a choice. Once it got bought, it was time to leave.

    Edit: It is possible the employees had golden handcuffs after the purchase. If so, I don’t blame them. I know a guy who worked at a startup that got bought. For a few years he was making 3x his salary. Staying was actually sucking money away from the company as there was no way he was producing enough to be worth that pay. So he stayed until that ran it’s course and then left.

  • Jo Miran@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 hour ago

    In Foundation lore, didn’t the robots ultimately get wiped out, except one, who was held prisoner for thousands of years before ultimately turned into a slave?

  • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Foundation’s widely reported $24 million in Pentagon contracts actually stems from its 2024 acquisition of Boardwalk Robotics, which held some existing government research contracts, the people said.

    This is such passive language, it makes it sound like the Pentagon had no choice but to continue the contract.

    In federal contracting, there is something called a Novation Agreement when a company is bought or sold. The novation process has 3 parties, Original Company A, New Company B, and the Governmental Agency. During this process, its the responsibility of Company A to detail all of the contract terms to New Company B, its the responsibility of new company B to attest that they can fulfill the terms of the contract, it’s the responsibility of Governmental Agency to vet New Company B and assure that what they are attesting to is accurate.

    • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Kakistocracy, too.

      They are exactly like every shitty warlord dictator that pillages their home country and then runs away to some other country with all the money they stole.

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        41 minutes ago

        At least that’s better than our current situation where the shitty warlord dictator pillages their home country and then stays safely in that country and maintains power.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 hours ago

    When asked for a comment Eric Trump said…“My father…(blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda)”.

  • A_norny_mousse@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    robot soldier

    Is that even realistic?

    edit: refering to the humanoid thingy in the thumbnail - depending on one’s definition of robot these have been around for a very long time.

  • Avicenna@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    In today’s news: Man who wants to make machines of war and oppression turns out to be a major dick.

    And welcome to the US where this guy can still raise billions from investors:

    Synapse was a behind-the-scenes player until its collapse left more than 100,000 Americans with a combined $265 million in deposits locked out of their FDIC-backed accounts.

    While some customers received partial payments during Synapse’s bankruptcy proceedings, thousands remain without access to their money after more than two years. A bankruptcy trustee, the former FDIC chair Jelena McWilliams, said as much as $96 million in customer funds went missing.

    • guycls@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 minutes ago

      Synapse was a non-bank company, so it didn’t provide FDIC protection against its own bankruptcy. FDIC insurance only pays out when a bank fails, and none of Synapse’s partner banks failed, so the FDIC couldn’t step in or pay the affected customers. Some customers were told otherwise, and a Synapse contract said funds were FDIC insured up to $250,000

      From LLM

    • Zron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 hours ago

      The article says the accounts are FDIC insured.

      FDIC insurance covers 250 thousand dollars in the account.

      265 million divided by 100,000 is only $2650 per account on average.

      Why don’t those people have their money back after over 2 years? Whats the fucking point of agreeing to FDIC insurance if the government can’t even cover 3 grand on average per account?

  • TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Advocates bootlickers for trickledown pissdown economics say that tax cuts in theory for businesses are meant to lessen cost, which means more margin and thus raise wages of employees. But I always point out only handful of businesses raise wages of their employees and most businesses, especially large corporations, only use the increased margin for stock buybacks to enrich themselves and shareholders.

      • mefisdo_dot_info@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Conservatives don’t think, don’t empathe, and don’t moralize. The entire ideology is about externalizing those mental activities to the power structure. Conservatism is the ant colony approach to the world. It’s a viable strategy for slowly changing environments. It is horrible for uncertain and rapidly changing environments like today’s world. They are sensing colony collapse and that has sent them into a frenzy. This is what we are experiencing. That won’t stop their collapse. The coming new societies will have to be aware of this trait in the human nature and make sure it is suppressed.

  • fonix232@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    127
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    So, let me be clear…

    My employer will refuse even a salary advance (as in, getting it 2-3 days, maybe a week early), but the bossman can walk away with a “loan” of the company’s entire liquidity?

    • Rothe@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 hours ago

      A lot of bossmen probably can’t, but if you are in cahoots with a member of the US royal family then you definitely can.

      • hitmyspot@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I know here in Australia, it is legal for business owners to use their floating cash to loan to themselves, such as for an offset against their mortgage. If it is paid back in full before the end of financial year, then it’s fine. If not, it needs to be at marker interest rate and incurs taxes and porift distribution.

        In this case, the loan is not the problem, but the not paying employees. Trading while insolvent is illegal and if they caused it by their loan, then they would and should face consequences. Usually fines. Since the new financial year in July, their superannuation (pension) must be paid within 7 days of payroll, so they’d be fined for that too.

  • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Sounds like blatant fraud and corruption.

    How does a guy who “took loans” from his own company immediately before that company declares bankruptcy (defrauding its customers) somehow start another company that same year and acquire an existing company with active DoD contracts which presumably require security clearances?

    And on top of that, to then two years later take another “loan” from again his own company, rendering it unable to pay its employees?

    This country really needs to prosecute white-collar crime better. Holy hell.

    And these are the people who will own the killbots?

    • Somebody_Else@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      18 hours ago

      How does a guy who “took loans” from his own company immediately before that company declares bankruptcy (defrauding its customers) somehow start another company that same year and acquire an existing company with active DoD contracts which presumably require security clearances?

      He was sure to pay off the republicans in charge.

  • frongt@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    17 hours ago

    That’s fine. Seize and sell the home to pay the employees.