Dude, calm down. That was specifically about he phrase 'seize the means of production. That’s associated with communism, a philosophy that is the exact opposite of fascism. So it’s interesting that they both seize the means of production in order to gain power, it’s just who they seise it for that differs. Is that alone not interesting to ponder?
No, not really. Every economic model is based around who has control over the means of production and how they distribute access to it. That’s just economics. It isn’t a novel or profound thought.
The fact that both communism and capitalism/fascism requires taking control of the means of production is no more interesting of a thing to ponder than the fact cooking your food and burning people alive requires the use of heat
Dude, calm down. That was specifically about he phrase 'seize the means of production. That’s associated with communism, a philosophy that is the exact opposite of fascism. So it’s interesting that they both seize the means of production in order to gain power, it’s just who they seise it for that differs. Is that alone not interesting to ponder?
No, not really. Every economic model is based around who has control over the means of production and how they distribute access to it. That’s just economics. It isn’t a novel or profound thought.
The fact that both communism and capitalism/fascism requires taking control of the means of production is no more interesting of a thing to ponder than the fact cooking your food and burning people alive requires the use of heat
But only communism is known to have a slogan associated with it FFS. So, yes, really. You must be fun at parties.
Lol, ok child.