The court’s order opens a path for the administration to begin action to restrict mail voting, but it also could lead to further litigation that could freeze the federal government again.
So someone who voluntarily ran to be elected as a representative of the people in the party that is supposed to oppose Republicans isn’t doing a god damned thing to stop blatant voter disenfranchisement, yet you claim he “isn’t responsible for this?” What exactly is he responsible for if it isn’t “opposing republicans” and isn’t “representing the people?”
That’s precisely the problem.
So someone who voluntarily ran to be elected as a representative of the people in the party that is supposed to oppose Republicans isn’t doing a god damned thing to stop blatant voter disenfranchisement, yet you claim he “isn’t responsible for this?” What exactly is he responsible for if it isn’t “opposing republicans” and isn’t “representing the people?”