• clucose@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      2 days ago

      Must be a slow news day. We did this in our studies at university 20 years ago.

    • kboos1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      I’ve never heard a good engineer ever say “let’s use an unnecessary amount of material”, usually engineers say “this is what you need to achieve the goal and this is why…”. Then management adds contingency while trying to also cut cost, then the project manager orders material too early to drive revenue and it expires or get lost, then the crew always has waste, the list goes on.

      Efficient engineering is rarely the problem, but if there’s a tool that reliably makes my job easier and faster then sure, bring it on

      • P03 Locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Then management adds contingency while trying to also cut cost,

        No, they just cut cost, beyond what the engineering was designed for. Then they end up as a mini-documentary on some channel like Plainly Difficult.

  • muhyb@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 days ago

    Don’t mention this to building contractors here. Some of them already use less materials than regulations.

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Are they sure there isn’t any “AI” in there?

    Seriously though I vastly prefer the term “computer model”. Props to everyone involved for honest journalism and honest science. Refreshing.