The shutdown will halt about $8 billion a month in federal food assistance. Walmart captures 24% of all SNAP shopper spending, according to Numerator’s 2025 SNAP Evolution report—triple Kroger’s share and far ahead of Costco, Amazon and Sam’s Club.

Walmart was the first retailer to accept SNAP online in all 50 states in 2023 and launched the Walmart+ Assist program, which offers half-price memberships for those receiving aid.

“If SNAP payments stop, spending by the lowest income groups will fall,” said Neil Saunders, managing director of data and analytics firm GlobalData. “Walmart gets a plurality of the spending, so it will be hit the hardest.”

This was somewhat epiphanic for me.

I already recognized companies such as Walmart were subsidizing pay through social programs such as SNAP and essential funneling/laundering tax payer money to their executives.

This headline made me further realize they’re not only making taxpayers subsidize wages, they’ve also effectively turned the USD into a form of company scrip. While that scrip can be spent at some other locations I bet a large percent of funneled right back to e.g. Walmart itself. If you already work at Walmart it makes spending your SNAP benefit there easier.

          • Riskable@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            9 months ago

            Trump administration: “Good! Maybe some of those poors will die and save us the trouble of removing their tents!” [roflol]

          • ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            the USDA is operated by thousands of people, the head is appointed by trump.
            if the head of the usda is facing jail for contempt vs maybe getting fired, he’ll fund snap.
            and that’s exactly what happened today, ebt was funded. trump is appealing but the money is there.
            my state funded it and was waiting for a commitment by the usda, apparently they got it.
            trump and his administration have complied with other court orders, they’ve defied some… but they eventually give in when appeals run out.
            a big part of the shutdown is that they’ve slipped in legislation to strip judges of their powers to enforce their orders… such as nationwide injunctions, holding people in contempt, and sending federal marshals out to arrest people in contempt of court… they currently still have those powers.
            it’s quite complicated.

            • warbond@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              9 months ago

              Was it the head of the USDA withholding funds? I was under the impression that the administration said there were no funds, and then there was no way to release the funds, and then that it would be too complex to do so with any expediency.

              Why are they appealing the ruling, do you think?

              • ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                The head of the USDA does what Trump says or she gets fired… but she’s still the one with direct control.
                The USDA already has a contingency fund, for this very sort of thing. They were refusing to fund SNAP until a judge forced them too…. they had this money set aside before the government shutdown, and December is still uncertain.
                Why they’re appealing it is, id assume, what they’ve been saying about hating all social safety net type programs, and really it’s about rich people paying taxes….
                they’re vindictive enough to use any opportunity to fuck with any program as much as they can get away with…

        • Afaithfulnihilist@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          The only naive oversimplification here is believing that when the USDA is ordered to do something by a judge that means Trump automatically does it.

          Snap is dark. There was a court order to turn on the lights. Those lights have not turned on yet. Don’t be pedantic if you can’t bring the receipts.

          • ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            they have defied and appealed rulings, some have been upheld and complied with….
            what you’re talking about is what they want to do and one reason why the government is shut down right now.

    • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Don’t count your chickens until they hatch. Or in this case, don’t count your SNAP until it’s actually in your pocket.

        • BradleyUffner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I’m truly shocked that they actually paid. That’s some good news. I’m glad the people in need are getting when we owe them.

          • Breezy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            My mothers has not been paid nor is pending. Some states used state funding to pay out, most have not.

            • kautau@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Yeah I’m always saddened to see anecdotal “it works for me” or “it doesn’t work for me” comments about something like this, where it’s super complex and until we know the rules are in place and enforced, we should assume it is not working for those who need it.

    • Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      So odd seeing libs talk you down in this thread, and not do basic research.

      I haven’t really been following all of this because I don’t need SNAP (yet), but it seems like it’s not hard to figure this out with Google.

      Hopefully more states figure out how to allocate the USDA’s emergency funds before more people starve.

      • ozymandias@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        it’s doomer stuff i think… they can only scream about how horrible everything is.
        if anything good happens, no it didn’t.
        that or bots.
        seems like a bot thing to not have live google access