• Bdtrngl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    Until they start paying tax and stop molesting children all of them can fuck right off.

    • funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      not just that but literally from this article:

      “marriage is between a man and a woman”

      no it fucking isnt. Source: all the places where you can get married without being a man and a woman.

      they are saying pasta can only have red sauce while i eat a bowl of carbonara in front of them.

      the best one can do now is say “marriage *should go back to being between a man and a woman”, which they won’t because they’re fucking cowards.

      they should own up to their own stupid ass beliefs.

      • root@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        marriage is SUPPOSED to be between a man and a woman

        if murder is illegal, why does it still happen?

        • SnoopSqueak@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          That is an offensive false equivalence.

          Murder is unsustainable for society. Murder happens without consent, so even if you do not support murder, you might be murdered.

          Gay relationships can be just as healthy as straight ones. Marriage is supposed to happen with consent. If you do not want to marry someone of the same sex or gender, you do not have to.

              • root@lemmy.wtf
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                I was just saying that things can be done even if they shouldn’t be

                  • root@lemmy.wtf
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    the equivalence was to show that even if something is prohibited, it can be done even if it shouldnt be