cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/38345975

Zohran Mamdani was elected mayor of New York City on Tuesday, capping a stunning ascent for the 34-year-old state lawmaker, who was set to become the city’s most liberal mayor in generations.

In a victory for the Democratic party’s progressive wing, Mamdani defeated former Gov. Andrew Cuomo and Republican Curtis Sliwa. Mamdani must now navigate the unending demands of America’s biggest city and deliver on ambitious — skeptics say unrealistic — campaign promises.

With the victory, the democratic socialist will etch his place in history as the city’s first Muslim mayor, the first of South Asian heritage and the first born in Africa. He will also become the city’s youngest mayor in more than a century when he takes office on Jan. 1.

  • datavoid@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    All I can say for sure is that I now feel like like I probably could have accomplished more with my life, considering we are the same age.

    • Evkob (they/them)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Clearly you’ve either never had hope or have already given up.

      I get it, we’ve all been burned by politicians promising things and never delivering. I think it’s easier to deliver on campaign promises at a local level than in national politics, though. Even at the scale of NYC.

      For an example of a mayor of a large city delivering on their promises, look at Anne Hidalgo in Paris (coincidentally, also a member of a socialist party).

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Clearly you’ve either never had hope or have already given up.

        “Inside every cynical person is a disappointed idealist.” - George Carlin

    • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      8 months ago

      We’ve got to keep the hope alive. He won’t be able to do everything he wants to do. And some things will take time. But he needs support. Think of all the promises that trump has made and immediately reneged - and his base still supports him and that’s why he has power. Of course we need to hold politicians responsible, but we need to do it in a way that doesn’t splinter our efforts.

      • Verdant Banana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        typical democrat response

        we like our candidate, okay if he does not get anything done not his fault, things take time so can’t fault him if does not get enough done, and the other side is worse

        • CannonFodder@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Well nothing is better than making things worse. But I do expect this guy to make some progress, just not on everything.
          The point is that 40% of the population will still support trump even though he has failed on many many of his promises. If progressives flake out just because their guy doesn’t manage to do everything at once, we hand the control to the assholes who will actively make things worse.

  • arin@lemmy.worldBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 months ago

    I don’t understand why the whole country of Republicans are so focused on a mayor. Feels like we need secret service to protect the mayor now with all the fascist shit targeting him.

    • aceshigh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      They’re afraid that this will start a progressive momentum across the us. The new major does need protection. The whole world is watching.

  • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    Let’s not get too excited.

    He barely edged out a guy with a history of sexual harassment and a radio shock jock.

          • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Kinda proving my point here.

            Cuomo resigned after his sex scandal, and still managed to get a substantial portion of the vote.

            You can’t ascribe all that to the billionaires. A lot of people really, really hate anything that looks even slightly progressive, and that’s in one of the Bluest towns in the country.

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    When centrists inevitably say “yeah, but that’s new york, he couldn’t have won anywhere else,” remember that these are the same people who were lobbing Islamophobic attacks at him.

    • jonne@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Some of the shit I’ve seen was honestly disgusting. Especially tying 9/11 to him somehow. Like the racism that’s traditionally coming from Republicans was coming from Democrats too.

      • Fizz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Do you have any examples? The racism and attacks against Mamdami ive seen have all been very clearly from right wingers and “independents” that are trump aligned.

          • Fizz@lemmy.nz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            I was about to say i stand corrected but I’m reading that article im struggling to find anything Islamophobic in those quotes. Is it because she said he was pro hamas?

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              I was about to say i stand corrected but I’m reading that article im struggling to find anything Islamophobic in those quotes.

              Your bar for Islamophobia is conveniently high, then.

              • Fizz@lemmy.nz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                I’m tired what am I missing. It sounds like the same Jewish reaction to him we’ve seen for the past 6 months and doesnt seem to be anything to do with Islam and has everything to do with comments hes actually made and since walked back.

                I thought it was going to be a dem talking about him eating rice with hands or enacting sharia law. This isnt islamophobia and isnt even news worthy. Having read that article like 3 times now ive got to say its so badly written actual slop outlet.

      • BlackJerseyGiant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        It’s almost like there isn’t really a difference between most Republicans and most Democrats…Like some sorta, I dunno, bread and circus show or somethin. Weird

        • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Up until Reagan, the two Parties were pretty much the same. There were Liberal GOPs and and Conservative Dems. Nixon saw that there were a lot of disaffected Dems who hated the Civil Rights Act and pulled them in with his “Southern Strategy.” Reagan was the first to start attacking “Liberals” by name.

    • floofloof@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      That’s such a feeble criticism: a socialist, living in a capitalist society where everything costs money, needs money to do things, therefore they’re not really a socialist. There’s no logic to that. Why would anyone imagine that a socialist doesn’t need money to do things in a capitalist society? Is he a fraud because he hasn’t transformed New York into a moneyless society since yesterday (despite not even being sworn in yet)? When did he promise to do that, or is it just right wingers having no clue what socialism is again?

      Cartoon