nailingjello

Wasn’t this part of the plot of the TV show Common Side Effects ?

Good show btw.

Have I got a car for you. Designed with no intelligence whatsoever, including Artificial Intelligence.

This is great news, thanks for posting.

The last paragraph in the article indicates that availability won’t be immediate, but still a welcome change.

Sunscreens with bemotrizinol are expected to be available by the end of the year, according to the ingredient manufacturer DSM-Firmenich.

Monterey Park is the city in California, in case anyone else is wondering.

Is something like that very typical?

To answer your question, here is the first paragraph:

It is a sad world record: Iranian society is living under the longest internet shutdown ever imposed on an entire state worldwide as of today (as of Sunday, April 5, 2026). Today marks the 37th day that society in Iran has been offline, leading to massive restrictions in daily life.

What’s the background for your link? Who puts out that info, what insight does it bring, and how honest is it?

Did a quick search on F-Droid and found RadarWeather. Maybe it’ll work for you.

From the article:

“One thing, you don’t want to signal too much when we go in,” Trump said. “We went in very hard and we didn’t tell anyone about it because we wanted surprise. Who knows better about surprise than Japan? Why didn’t you tell me about Pearl Harbor?”

Text for the lazy.

Duverger’s Law

In political science, Duverger’s law holds that single-ballot plurality-rule elections (such as first past the post) structured within single-member districts tend to favor a two-party system.

Duverger’s law is the reason why U.S. voters select one of the two leading candidates when voting tactically, even if a third-party candidate would better represent their interests. This behavior arises out to fear of vote splitting

One consequence of Duverger’s law is that you can improve the viability of third-party candidates by changing the voting system. For example, Approval voting is more resistant to vote splitting and therefore more conducive to third-party candidates.

Based on their comment above I asked if the following assumptions were correct. They appeared to confirm them:

It sounds like you are saying that if a drunk cyclist hits a pedestrian, it’s impossible for the pedestrian to get injured.

Or if that same cyclist weaves out in to the street, a car that hits them cannot be damaged (and the driver of the car won’t be held liable even though cyclists pretty much always have the right of way vs. cars).

Are you saying there are recorded facts that agree with their assumptions? Could you please provide a source?

Thanks for confirming my assumptions above. I don’t agree.

It sounds like you are saying that if a drunk cyclist hits a pedestrian, it’s impossible for the pedestrian to get injured.

Or if that same cyclist weaves out in to the street, a car that hits them cannot be damaged (and the driver of the car won’t be held liable even though cyclists pretty much always have the right of way vs. cars).

If you poop out the stolen item, I think we can move past calling them a “suspected” thief.

Wait until you find out What’s playing second base.