And continues to put all its effort on increasing that gap…in the wrong direction.
Cancelled CHIPs act funding
Gutted university level research
Cancelled green energy installations (at a time when more power than ever is needed for stupid datacenter builds)
And paying premiums for dirtier, less efficient power stations to stick around
None of that stopped him from staying this shit 8 years ago. Why do you think it will now that he’s even more unhinged?
I think a bunch of homes have what’s often called a Mother-In-Law suite. Effectively a separated section or the house, or sometimes even a separate building in the same land parcel, where an older relative, or grown up child might live, but with a touch more privacy. Nothing to stop those being rented out, either.
So this would prevent those getting bought up. I believe you can get up to a 4 unit with certain types of government backed home loans.
They (at last some of them) were involved in the previous nuclear agreement, which the pedophile ripped up. Didn’t help them then.
Well yeah, they were trained off of data with massive racial hiring bias.
Garbage in garbage out.
What makes them horrible? I like my no-profile wallet. I don’t want cards being readable through them. That’s the point
Bold of you to assume there ever was a plan
Not sure why you expected apartments to be covered by a bill addressing home ownership.
The bill mentions nothing of a 350 limit, where are you pulling that number?
And companies can’t buy more single family homes at all. So, no, they couldn’t do that. Only way to get more is by building them themselves and not selling - which is not the business model that builders use.
Edit: 350 is the number that could be used to define a large institutional investor, but the number is in aggregate, so spinning up a subsidiary doesn’t change the number it would own.
Then you can’t use it anyway, and the fascists have won.
You should have an RFID blocking wallet regardless of this tech existing.
This does not appear in the HR bill. Corporations are not allowed to purchase any new single family residences (which can have up to 2 units) at all. They’re not forced to sell what they currently own, but can’t buy up more.
Doesn’t. This only refers to 1-2 unit structures.
It seems this is mostly covered: controlling the financial manager or over 25% of the entity that controls the homes counts as the company owning the house. But those first level entities wouldn’t be able to buy any more, any way.
Biggest one seems to be: this does nothing to force companies to divest their current ownership of single family homes.
They can just continue to sit on them indefinitely.
“It’s a mystery how they’re so low” - US pharma as they slip an envelope of bills into a politicians pocket
Lol, as if charisma vacuum Vance could get Netanyahu to do anything.
Again. Again again.
They keep doing this.
The other third keep voting to shoot themselves in the foot.
Too bad. Your job is doing the right thing the first time around. Nott pretending to regret doing the bad thing everyone told you was bad.